Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #LA23-000059 <br />October 16, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br /> <br />Section 78-330 & 78-1279 – Accessory Structure Setbacks: <br />LR-1B District Required Existing Proposed <br />Rear/Street 17.5’ 500’+ 500’+ <br />North Side 10’ 95’ 95’ <br />South Side 10’ 5’ 6’ <br />Lakeshore 75’ 160’ 138’ <br />Average Lakeshore * Not Met – The improvement is completely within ALS <br /> <br />Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 – Hardcover Calculations: <br />Stormwater <br />Overlay District <br />Tier <br />Total Area Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />Tier 1 74,496 s.f. 18,624 s.f. <br />(25 %) <br />11,428 s.f. <br />(15.3%) <br />12,335 s.f. <br />(16.5%) <br /> <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) <br />The intent of the ordinance is to protect the lake views enjoyed by neighboring properties. Structures over <br />42 inches in height are prohibited in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Much of the existing <br />home is within the average lakeshore setback and is nonconforming. The proposed accessory structure is <br />over the 42 inch height limitation and is located within the average lakeshore setback. The 6-foot <br />accessory structure is intended to provide screening for the patio and will contain elements of an outdoor <br />kitchen. The impacted neighbor to the south is situated at a higher elevation and will not be negatively <br />impacted by the wall as it does not block any view of the lake. Both homes are significantly set back from <br />the lake, there is a topography change, and there is dense vegetation between the two lots. The <br />neighbor’s views of the lake are protected and therefore the intent of the ordinance is met. <br /> <br />Side Yard Setback Variance for Accessory Structure (Section 78-330) <br />The proposed improvement includes a 6-foot screen wall around outdoor kitchen elements including a <br />grill and sink which intensifies the use of the wall. The proposed screen wall is considered to be an <br />accessory structure rather than a fence and must adhere to the accessory structure setbacks. The <br />accessory structure setbacks limit placement of structures such as sheds, patios, etc. on lots. The subject <br />property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District which requires a 10-foot side yard setback. The proposed <br />accessory structure is approximately 6 feet from the side (southern) property line where 10 feet in <br />required. There is ample room on the site for the project to meet the 10 foot required side yard setback. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed <br />variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, <br />light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding <br />area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal <br />provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties <br />because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend <br />approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical <br />difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy <br />systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06,