Laserfiche WebLink
|l»PW^W&':‘'-f^miSMrnmmf^wm^••:..v.;.Y-;j.VY .-.i.-:;Y. ^mMiir^'mm. <br />W3miIP <br />Vi!-'* <br /><%':>-v-^ ■; <br />^•**'_-V , • •. •■ <br />'S_: ;,• •.^'^■:'’'^[%i’'( <br />pi^fei <br />^ . a';^' v^^’;r'. 't’r' :>^\;i[-...'-f <br />Vi^'- •>:. ■ ;:i:-i;.- r ■ ^ ^ <br />1 <br />Pc. . ' ..:Y*Y?C <br />Pf:i|ill/I- <br />IliKilfci <br />H <br />-•. • • r ’ <br />V- ■.#'■! <br />CCS^iYY^C?.;,. <br />iiMii <br />wmmm 4 <br />i <br />lift*. <br />>'.t »iYP <br />Wimmm. <br />:Yi.•« <br />Lc;^c'Cfe.i.Y: <br />tV...-C-- ' VA-.- Y. <br />-J-: -•. • - : - . <br />• ''-7'^ 4I •?'•V .• <br />■f <br />V : ^ ■ --N ••-:■- V: •: •mmmm <br />f‘.;’;*C .. / ’ ,:i;^ <br />•^. . ■'-t"^’ -Vv <br />»cc^c;::c!>:;^iiil <br />■ !>*.m <br />WS*:.-r: <br />' *..* • • • s! <br />,.vA -=■•:; ..■ v>*. :i <br />■mmm <br />■Y^‘*f- it - ■■Zoning File #1444 August 16, 1989 Page 2 of 3Acceas/Puture Road Corridors -? review Exhibit P. As of this writing, the Citv <br />coni*nVa” comments have not been received. Per hiscomments upon inspection of the site and review of the <br />bS^f?SvA".®l''‘°'*”/K '" that • «..«<1 outlot/«x?.>,,lon <br />SJ-f I-ot 1 per the attached sketche future roa<J extension is recommended at a 25' width to <br />approximately align with Christine Drlte to th^west tJo <br />Itl rjLl i? ? .° »« f«rved. There 1. e potential of 6 lot. with <br />Thi City will^Jik" t°h.»’’* ^°C, "^“*“=•'1 ■• Lot 4 In Exhibit P. <br />no^i-h 1 ^ outlet be designated along the <br />SSIlot lltno ^ ■”>• d«*l9n«ion o? the road <br />ro.7 , require realignment of the lot line <br />»S”So«‘aria“‘’ «>• ^ «re.i?J <br />eiAu <5efinlng future road corridors, the detached structure <br />deflMd°?« structure. The future road :an b! <br />o«ti«?^r.f ^ outlots per staff sketch (Exhibit G). The northern <br />outlet can remain under shared ownership of Lots 1 and 2 hut the <br />western outlet must be combined with Lo? 1. The ?ltv Crll f <br />thS Sm!*^thi"citS*5 utility easements over both outlots. At <br />a»t., determines that there is a need to install the <br />either a Drive, the barn shall ^be <br />.4.^”®af razed depending on the condition of the <br />exlatiUS®K i® realistic to ask the subdivider to move the <br />JJstaYr^roaY." ‘**‘^*“** Planning need of the^^Uy tl <br />of thl^evfi^r Engineer has not discussed the issue of improvement <br />that <br />pr;.^tSd”n%rm.‘.\*inTf‘or <br />Septic - <br />““r"‘d - - “rb.’‘d/.?,r4' fS? <br />Jifctf F ‘r^»r^V4fV*h*a^. 'y"iJ?MSire With the on-site evaluator and we have approved an alternate <br />o^e^^S^S^^® Shown in the shaded area on Exhibit P. BaVed JS <br />auatf?n borings, it would appear that the site would <br />dJIree^ of slop"e^. ®^®^®”‘ mottling and the <br />J <br />.Y : ••: <br />.-•A- •..•;• • <br />a . • •-.• V :/T.'V .•*.r:- <br />• ., .I:'. <br />i <br />f- <br />-r <br />\v'- <br />• ^w :."••i.-: - ■■• '■ ■' '.■■ ;■: : ’ <br />"I. <br />^;-^:l'CC^:cccY-CYC c <br />t: . ■>: <br />ii <br />"i'C^ ■;a CC ;'.-C:CV ■ ‘ - :•,, Y C.;Y' i- rtMm <br />rn iMm'mRs <br />^S«?;Cf$ S«A ; <br />?C:y Y';Y. <br />V ;v .:: .'>*1 <br />:.Y^Y■YY.^;^.VSCv;^^v'Y^:& <br />-V ;.•.■■ V.: '■ ■■:.;. ■■■ . <br />x:.YY,:c <br />• ■ * •"V *"■■.•:;••■■■ <br />■A ;V.. ■•Y':-. : <br />V <br />mi <br />mfi ’ ■.. .:■■ '.■ ■/• '■.. <br />■Vi <br />M <br />!r <br />;•••■=: ■ 'K ' <br />C?V>-r:' : <br />:: <br />*i* '4 <br />• ^'i •. Y -.i-e-i <br />mm <br />Zoning i August 1 Page 3 o <br />The <br />septic s <br />the on-a <br />division <br />encroach <br />wo that <br />meeting. <br />Den; <br />Subc <br />Seri <br />denj <br />Plan <br />lot <br />rece <br />(Coll <br />lots <br />Apprc <br />basec <br />! <br />Appro\ <br />f <br />c <br />n <br />B <br />1 <br />C <br />e <br />0 <br />t] <br />6: <br />a) <br />E) <br />ba <br />P«