Laserfiche WebLink
for <br />Ing <br />>ri ! <br />imm ?-^:V^V::>;v v^:: <br />iiIWi*. <br />|y;; : . <br />-'d1/:- ■t'smmmm <br />ii'^fclSii <br />■r -. - ,:■ ;.'-^ .- - i- :rl: <br />} , ;••:•■ ' . I .a:' -..^ ^ ,• ■ ■ ;., .; . - . i ; <br />L=- <br />>;■ ■■''Vi <br />. • r•• .V . •••!. .'.. <br />immm <br />;|| <br />1.?^' <br />^T.• . -V-;■ ..'"..v wmTb:Date:Subject: <br />List of 1 <br />Planning Conmission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator BernhardsonMichael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning a Zoning Administrator August 14, 1987•1174 Craig Anderson, 375 Leaf Street/3300 Bayside Itoad <br />Preliminary Plat - Second Review <br />libits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit 0 <br />Discussion - <br />Revised Preliminary Plat Drawing <br />Sketch With Staff Recommendations <br />Memo a Exhibits of 7/15/87 <br />Planning Commission Minutes of 7/20/87 <br />P*^®vided a relatively complete preliminary plat drawing <br />as of 8/14/87. Proposed dimensions, house sites, septic sites# and <br />driveway locations are shown. The appropriate easements for floodplain# <br />drainageways, and drainage and utilities along lot lines, have been shown. <br />Site Planning - <br />1 j. Because this is a very unique property, it is appropriate to address <br />individual site planning during this subdivision review, although in most <br />other relatively simple plats we would not be as concerned with house and <br />driveway locations. <br />- Is the most critical because it contains some unusually steep <br />slopes and a major drainageway. The two septic sites as shown on the <br />staff sketch are acceptable and functional, and will not affect any <br />neighboring wells. Neither site will be affected by driveway location, <br />although staff suggests that the driveway continue to the house site <br />siH^^l^^see'^staff VkeVch)*^^* ^ instead of swinging easterly towards septic <br />1- ^*** applicant's proposed configuration# the house site is very <br />#ft*Vn\*** septic to the south, the new lot line to the north-east# and the <br />40-50t embankment on the northwest. Staff would suggest that the lot line <br />move easterly as sho%#n, leaving approximately 2.3 buildable acres in Lot 1 <br />and 2.5 buildable acres in Lot 2. This will give much more flexibility in <br />house placement on Lot 1 in consideration of the 30* required side setback, <br />but will not appreciably affect the buildabllity of Lot 2. <br />mm <br />m■: '-u-rPfr'PSmm 4 <br />. r- <br />V-