Laserfiche WebLink
acketts Point <br />all adjacent to <br />sent to Bracketts <br />ine <br />d road) <br />% <br />ver <br />height variance for <br />Lcation #1027 <br />>entine" brick <br />Point Road and <br />approved along <br />g drive serving <br />vised that the <br />be installed at <br />r.sV:;;,:, V-0 ': v'- -V <br />WW:•i -f, ' -v =•■W-mmpmSi7;v ; :;t;/: p p-fmMMp'i... • i: . <br />mm <br />Zoning File #1438-Pillsbury August 14« 1989 Page Two of Twothe legal 3.5* height. The applicant failed to proceed with the <br />installation of the wall because the variations in height would <br />inpact the integrity of the design and landscape theme for this <br />odd-shaped property. <br />Review of Current Application - ^ <br />Please review Exhibit G, the revised plan requests approval <br />of a 4* high sepentine wall installed per current site plan. The <br />applicant's architect has presented several hardships and <br />concerns that the owner has now that she has <br />residence for over 4 years. Briefly# they are noted as follows: <br />1. Heavy traffic on County Road 15. This appears to be the <br />only residence located directly on the corner and security <br />becomes a major concern. <br />2. The site is low and there is no bank to discourage <br />people from walking onto property. There have been Instances <br />where owner has been disrupted at odd hours of the night from <br />persons with car problems on within this vicinity of County Road <br />15 and Bracketts Point Road. <br />The applicant proposes the installation of a 4' high <br />serpentine wall running 280' along the north <br />County Road 15 property line, Bracketts Point Road and the south <br />property line, per Exhibit C. Once again the new proposal does <br />not create a vision or sighting problem for any of the publi <br />using the adjacent roadways. The City has received no negative <br />comments from the adjacent neighbors notified of the variance <br />application. <br />*^^**Denial - please refer to the necessary findings in Section <br />10.08, subd. 3, also as amended in Ordinance 24, Second Series, <br />7/14/86. <br />Approval - based on the hardships and findings noted above. <br />Approval is subject to the condition that the applicant obtain a <br />building permit prior to the installation of the 8 wide <br />serpentine retaining wall* <br />Tp-pp: b ':pj p:. <br />:v • <br />x:-- .•-i <br />V- ••/■A--.r-M-■m/mmmmmrn