Laserfiche WebLink
M0BiMx•>• r;^-JOred setback <br />ed road) <br />.3% <br />5% <br />.1% <br />1% <br />the proposed <br />to the rear <br />t a garage <br />a new curb <br />>s will be <br />the survey# <br />led road at <br />th. Please <br />sviews the <br />at mm m <br />• ^• •'.: r. •. <br />d:::dfcrdddd: m <br />HSSIS^rV;-* d,- vmmmmmm. <br />^ ''-iA-.' '• ■ ■■•■•■ <br />,. ^ d,-; <br />■ ■ ■ ■:'•" •..■•;■; ' v : .'^ ■ ' <br />4ji . .i--.drwd J , iZoning Pile #1435-Hafus August 14# 1989 Page Two of Twohardships of the applicant. Briefly they are as follows! <br />1. Existing garage serves as storage area requiring family <br />cars, etc., to be parked outside in driveway. <br />9 Husband is volunteer for Mound Fire Department and in <br />winter' time cars being stored out on the driveway create major <br />problems for responding to emergencies in adequate time. <br />3. Garage had to be located to the east side of the rear <br />S1TA- hc'ur.! ’'^iT .“ia^tTon';‘ral'';na7nrn". S"a: not h.ve <br />SSo^ate are. within th. d.tlned bulldln? envelop.. <br />4 Location of house on lot prevents addition from <br />the on’e additional foot setback area. Once because of the <br />loJa^ion of the viewing window and integrity of roof line. <br />5. Applicant notes no negative impact upon adjacent Orono <br />Park. <br />6. Proposed location of addition does not require removal <br />of any trees. <br />Application is to be denied please refer to <br />section 10^08, aubd. 3, and a. amended In Ordinance 24, Second <br />Series, 7/14/36. <br />annroval - Subject to the findings and hardships noted by <br />ea Annmval is subject to the Condition that no new curb <br />Proper" la already aerved by two curb cut.. <br />•>iil■ :: v'^A- ■ . ■.'■•'jfKrfv;::; - vv:V. ■•. V <br />siiiB <br />C ■ ' -r p <br />mm <br /><y-,4 *-rf ;V <br />'^4 ^.-t _. ,g.‘i4V iVmippp■■■ ‘V <br />API <br />om <br />gp-3'^j’V ^"■ :-a, <br />: ■ --:V : <br />\W-*; <br />•-• -t <br />'Pli