Laserfiche WebLink
"4 P^.V*•■- : ■■■ : = J‘■• .•• •■•.'• ' ■■ ■■■.■ i ■ ' \ -A ''il4f::::: ■'■■"■.■■■,v <br />ninistrator <br />ihore setback <br />>ack diagram the <br />ately 1* to 1/2' <br />(tback. Review <br />^5-250' setback <br />s.f. added for <br />ast side of the <br />itandard of the <br />appears that a <br />story balcony <br />erage lakeshore <br />Ln front of the <br />fli : M 'i'S^-•!PAj::- : ^ <br />-;S>r <br />H <br />. ■■ ■• • ' <br />r-L-mm <br />•'i. -.,r '-. <br />i X I <br />9y' <br />... ; <br />y <br />'..ii-E. <br />mm <br />> <br />■ .:.' ■ ---O ;*• <br />mmm1t:PP:irPPv‘•5 -=C‘ -V :=.••' ' <br />S T«f5. -•, M ■ . <br />3U- ■• . .# <br />' I ’ '■•^U- <br />1. • . ••'■ <br />It <br />>' <br />,r ■• 'T . . <br />i .:r <br />■■'. -p.' <br />'• .v' <br />, V v; ..v:;.: <br />Zoning Pile #1441 August 30, 1989 Page 2 of 2determination of the eetback'irlaVdiYfrrwith'’th“app “^:r“e7.‘lrth\n=*tL^\^\Va°cr-ron“f“ the‘'’ffiw"i“0-75' setback area ■ 9,727 s.f.75-250' setback area « 18,678 s.f.incli^^*staff adjusted the proposed hardcover to <br />Ejhibit H) ■ o' house. (Review <br />room ?n*d^"niie “.“on‘poronn'’“ e°^A.\” <br />Sf/e'rd.'“^‘T”h“" »«.i« or?h:^econd'Un/w7th\a*Jcon^ r t*: <br />property’ The® h^^rdco^^^^^^^ * improvement of theproperty. The hardcover is now shown at a total of 32% Not® <br />there is no hardcover within the 0-75' setback area The citS <br />has received no negative comments from the adjacent’neiqhbors^ <br />windows of the adjacent residences there^will be a negligible impact on lakeward views. <br />CommiMion°llth*ifm/f," Previous actions of the Planningsimilar variance requests, the applicant must be <br />limited®existing hardcover. Total improvements should be limited to a percentage of hardcover. o««uxa oe <br />Options of Action - <br />th® «i* denied Planning Commission should refer tothe necessary findings in Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (B). <br />ccn,lkr*?£r£7lVowlnV«n7in|":"^ Comml..lon may wish to <br />1. The encroachment of the average lakeshore setback is <br />at 1 to 1 1/2' and will have no negative impact on <br />the lakeward views of the adjacent residences. <br />propS?ty. "® hardcover in the 0-75' setback area on the <br />3. The proposed total area or size of the residence <br />structure is consistent with the size and area of <br />surrounding residences on adjacent lots of similar size. <br />hardcover amount of the runoff created by the <br />of th^ylrd? property runs to the rear and street side <br />Options of Conditions - <br />a. To maintain total hardcover at existing level at 29 5% <br />requiring the removal o£ 481 ..f. of erl.ting Im^iofemenls <br />394 .7"7r"20?°e7'of° requiring the removal ofjy* s.r. or 207 s.f. of existing hardcover. <br />B.c ■ • ■■ • • ■•• ■o- \ % ... . .• . • •• ■