Laserfiche WebLink
gaining to e proposed the access figuration > Chadwick area and that area Mabusth was not Outlot B <br />Ls safety <br />lyside <br />>e placed <br />taken to <br />oncerned <br />louthwest <br />t of the <br />low runs <br />erty and <br />trt that <br />a ditch <br />ind also <br />ly into <br />teer had <br />s were. <br />.shed to <br />upheld, <br />across <br />■evious <br />an one <br />:on and <br />at the <br />d that <br />Mr. <br />d. He <br />operty <br />:af f *8 <br />t just <br />th and <br />-V ^ ' V <br />WM <br />protective measures were being taken to preserve treas and how tree removal would affect drainage.Ms. Lucy Tavlor-3075 Farv iew had a correction to the indicTted drainage pattern. She said that runor^ crossed Fox Street, ran under Farview Lane and ran behind her house. She said there was a culvert that cresses Fox Street and another that went under Farview, 3 culverts under driveways and an open creek behind her house. She invited staff to observe this at their convenience. She too stated that the wetlands were not in theirnormal state.dr, Gronberg informed the residents that he had met with Hennepin County officials regarding the road access. They preferred to have the access across from Farview Lane. If it was <br />moved to the east, it would have to be offset 150' and sight <br />distance would be a problem. He said that the County preferred <br />only one access to keep County Road access to a minimum, with <br />regard to the wetlands, Gronh*<rg said that they did not use the <br />City wetlands map, but took el.*vations in the field to determine <br />the wetlands. They are showing an additional wetland that is not <br />evident on the wetland map. He said that they preferred not to <br />have Outlot A, but the City Engineer had recommended its <br />designation. He said that it was a wetland by nature of th^e <br />soils in the area. Mr. Gronberg said in regard to the 200 <br />frontage width, when a road curves such as this the only way to <br />meet the required footage is to put in cul-de-sac. However due <br />to these lots being very deep and the building sites being placed <br />back, the 200’ requirement would be met. Mr. Gronberg said thau <br />the subdivision plan would be submitted to the Minnehaha Cre^k <br />Watershed District. Any excess water that would result from tnis <br />subdivision would be stored. Additionally, baffles would be rsed <br />to control the water quality and quantity of runoff to it.® <br />present level. <br />Ms. Stubbs said that Outlot A was shown to encroach upon her <br />property. She said she had no interest in selling it at this <br />time. Acting Chairperson Bellows informed Ms. Stubbs of the <br />purpose and requirement for the outlot designation. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson asked about the soil testing in <br />tha area. Mr. Gronberg replied that the soil borings were l^ing <br />done, along with percolation testing and nc problems have been <br />indiated at this point. <br />Bellows noted that this was a preliminary subdivision and <br />before final plat approval would be granted, the soil tests must <br />prove positive. She further noted that the soil testing would be <br />helpful in confirming the location of the wetland. <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen had a difficult time seeing how <br />18 lots would fit into this area. He wanted to see two accesses <br />if there are more than 8 lots. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown indicated that he did not like <br />r ;r'„ -y .:. : ■ . - C <br />' ft <br />mswims.