09-06-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' subdivision mum cul-de-ca« i tes ^hi lengthtes thxs problem et. We understand r.eaf Street is Is better J®”' ^®<^her than * 1400 foot cul-de-sac *' ^’^t.ending the er police and fire I ^Iriven by the T u ®*^^®ntion John M. Lanier, stated that 5th during which •equire Don Carlson ■ > to bring the •on regulations, ‘ommodates the fer plantings o Leaf Street, the Proposed ains very little an answers the The Preferred ' i-s free of on, without, eveloper. le Developer ilxminary plat S'' —. •' ■ -T. '• ' ■' ■■■ • ■ ' * tfeissaft" ■ ‘ummmr . • . • ? ■ >’ ® ' a, 4y r y-r,- y:^-A - ^ V wy ■ -m immmm. Si>s y-.yy. ^Ks£®i„ wmys'W0m§m 1. It is not clear from the Developer's Revised Plat whether the lots oordering Leaf Street and Fox Street will have direct access to these streets. We would like the Developer to clarify that double access will not be permitted, and that no variances will be sought for double access. The lots should derive access exclusively from the proposed arterial roadway. 2. To insure that all state and federal laws are complied with, the City should require the Developer to indicate whether any of the ponds and low areas located on the Proposed Development come within the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife, or the Army Corp of Engineers. 3. We note that Lake Minnetonka 15> 3 to 4 feet below Its normal level. It is reasonable to assume that this has an effect on the water level of the ponds 2uid low areas located on the Proposed Development. The City should ascertain that the Developer's Revised Plat takes account of the current low water level. 4. The Developer should, as required, provide the City with a Storm Water Management Plan and a Soil Erosion Control Plan. Since runoff to Lake Minneconka flows through the property of one of us, we would like to review these plans as soon as they are submitted to the Planning Commission. 5. On-site septic testxng should be completed to the Planning Commission's satisfaction on each of the proposed lots. 6. The Developer should provide the City with a vegetation map, indicating the location of existing shade trees and proposed buffer trees. The City should insist on the reasonable preservation of all existing trees, and should require, in addition to landscape buffering, that new shade trees be planted in the open areas of the Proposed Development. SiSsi