09-06-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

if rw.. '■ :•^ •>%• -Vifi!:.f-Pii^ 7'-■mm mmif;:-:;h i.*£*»***■ • ''^* » ^ ■ sS#- slosure of the second > roof the deck for the I windows of residence. :e In either the three 3e converted to a porch :ructure that is to be erage lakeshore setback Btback area is almost iments. Final building cond story shown with f the non-encroachment ces that would suggest ridth would not have to Note the approvals of nee were conditioned on bo meet the 10* setback enclosure of the second he staircase be removed Please review the non- llnances to confirm bors have been advised no comments from either sment. Mr. Pirich may nove the second story >uth yard setback area, r variance reviews^ the sive hardcover on the Although this proposal , staff wold recommend the excess amounts of erty. Applicant should nmsision should refer to Subdivision 3 (B). following findings and for existing residence s not involve expansion pe. Lin' ....““■:r-"X .=.. mm ^ty. ■: , y w’'. ■W -vd . ■ mm ■A mmm r' yy:M Al' krt-y i;:H r V'0%fj*- vr. :^-y- tr SSI V-'-f'V- m -ft i Bk-yyy: /■ ^v::^ 7 :-7 :.. ..-: ::••■■ =:'..•■• ' ... - M. <r--.■ k'wmstoning Pile tl44» August 30* IfIf Page 3 of 3 2. The City ha* received no negative comments from the ntOBt affected neighbor* on the adjacent properties. Conditions of Approval* 1. Kemoval of second story staircase that encroach* south side setback area located I 1/2* from lot line. 2. Other conditions Planning Commission appr^riate. feel y.L ■ 5.'mi *4'^.% 7. ■ - I ■ ' A I'M V,v; , i'A r * myymnm ' 7'V - ^V-* mm '■ r/' m v\ : ' ■v=I \fk ■i 1 »:• ■.; •.-■ I ,