Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />October 16, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 11 <br /> <br />Nye said as proposed it would be about six feet from the property line. The side-yard setback variance is <br />not needed if they drop the outdoor kitchen. <br /> <br />Libby asked if there would be space to move the wall so the applicant could still have the accessory <br />kitchen. <br /> <br />The applicant said moving it that close to the house doesn’t make any sense. <br /> <br />Ressler said he would not support a six-foot wall but a fence would be acceptable at a height of six feet. <br /> <br />McCutchen moved, Schultze seconded, to recommend approval of LA23-000059, 980 Tonkawa <br />Road, Variance for Average Lakeshore Setback removing the outdoor kitchen. VOTE: Ayes: 5, <br />Nays 1 (Ressler). <br /> <br />7. LA23-000054 TEXT AMENDMENT WITHIN CHAPTER 78 WHICH <br />CONTEMPLATES THE ALLOWANCE OF RETAINING WALLS WITHIN THE <br />SHORE SETBACK ZONES <br /> <br />Community Development Director Oakden explained the City Council processes many variances for <br />retaining walls within the lakeshore setback every year. The Council directed staff to review the current <br />regulations relating to retaining walls and determine of if any amendments to the City Code should be <br />considered. City Staff presented information to the Council at the April 24, 2023 and May 19,2023 work <br />sessions which included general background information, examples of different types of walls and wall <br />construction, guidance from the Comprehensive Plan, DNR and other lake area communities. Currently, <br />the City Code prohibits retaining walls within the shore setback. The required shore setback for Lake <br />Minnetonka is 75-feet. The strict prohibition presents multiple challenges for residents who are working <br />to repair or replace failing walls or to address erosion issues. The current regulations do not provide any <br />guidance for best practices regarding material, methods, or screening of walls. Staff recommends the <br />Council amend the City Code to create an administrative process and a conditional use permit process to <br />permit retaining walls within the shore setback on properties with specific conditions. Additionally, <br />clarification to the definition of retaining walls and elimination of redundancy within the City Code will <br />be achieved with the proposed ordinance, she said. The ordinance would allow for an administrative <br />permit under some conditions and a conditional use permit process for others. To obtain a CUP it would <br />require a public hearing and professional engineering. This would include new walls or walls with <br />significant changes. Swapping out material on an existing wall up to four feet within the 75-foot <br />Lakeshore Setback could be accomplished with the administrative permit. <br /> <br />Chair Bollis opened the public hearing on the proposed ordinance revision at 8:39 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 8:39 p.m. <br /> <br />Bollis said he felt this was a needed change as retaining walls built in the 1970s are beginning to fail and <br />new materials and techniques are now available. It would be good for residents to be able to address more <br />of these with an administrative permit. <br />