06-19-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

wnship 118 N, right of way established Document No. following :hence running 'said SWl SWl of beginning of i distance of 222.03 feet id at right ' Spring Hill southeasterly thence continuing line along a it and a 5.86 feet; tance of line, and there r • •; ■: <l|H^9||||v.; ;..i ,• .•'!;■ f ■C: . ■ • •• ; :'• • W '■' ^ ,,■• • :• .-"V : . .! ■■. : .••'..r ■ ' • ■• • i-- .•■• ■ |;S®3i F- 'fj r vH-'V-s/' /•cf; ■ .M F M • O’ wMayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Planning Ccmmlsslon Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 13, 1989 Subject: #1289 Robert & Ann Will, 115 Old Crystal Bay Rd No Preliminary Subdivision - 2nd Review List of Exhibits - Exhibit A - Applicants' Letter to Council 5/30/89 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 6/6/89 Exhibit C - Planning Commission Notice of Action Exhibit D - Original Plan for Development At the public hearing on June 6, 1988, the application was tabled pending receipt of revised plans showing both one plan with access coming from Wear Lane North locating a temporary cul“ de-sac within the subject property and the second plan was to show a temporary/permanent driveway easement of 50' width extending from Old Crystal Bay Road westward. Once again, a temporary cul-de-sac was to be located within the roadway/drive— way. The applicants have asked to be rescheduled before the Planning Commission co once again discuss the southern property owner's attempt through a $20,000 fee per lot, to negate the early planning decisions of the City to create a future linking network of private reads to be taken v-ver by the City when roads "qualify" for public maintenance. It is not clear what plan the applicants wish us to act on as revised plans have not been submitted with the current letter the City. Please note the original plan showed private di^iveways extending through the north line of the Wear subdivision to the two new lots. Applicants should be advised that if this is to be an extension of a private road or a future public road, that the roadway must be constructed at the same standards for Wear Lane North with a temporary cul-de-sac within the subject property. it may also be required that the applicants remove the existing cul-de-sac. The City Engineer will be asked to comment on the status of the existing cul-de-sac within Wear Lane if a private/public road is to be extended to the north. Review specifically 7-13 Chapter 7 of the Community Management Plan, the rural transportation policies, CMP 7-11 through ;\/'v mj;i r’ '' ■ r: 'SS«|« WM A PvV';:i :v-/; v; ' f h - :: y- ■ m:L:m *fnv:■ 'Ij ■ • ii W K