Laserfiche WebLink
4 '■•• 4-'.'■¥5^V.:vy-*2T'••..•“•• ■•4 •'. ■ r 7 ’r _••. m I<||lnl|pi{^ ,'-.r^:^\ ,..>• ■ ^- - r * • • »►■•v74'-.V: >4^tp^vv-iW«• *> .•■•V.' -.-^ '• • «•■ : ;•i: •••■:••. : ... :..v' :*:•/:.••:'f.ing Administrator <br />ace - <br />lot size <br />tax parcel Into <br />ick Variance <br />icessory <br />LR-IB district: <br />40' <br />ns). By defini- <br />parcel for tax <br />e to detach or <br />im lot area is <br />nd building site <br />osal requires a <br />I Hardcover <br />.m <br />7^4 <br />A >• <br />mmmmm'. <br />i: :■mm- <br />mm <br />MMm <br />mv:-:mimMm <br />.mmsrnm <br />issmmmmM <br />' * iSwi '^- ' ' ' '^m-j <br />:<:7^v7V;., <br />^ •• •• =.• .4. <br />4 ;• ■ <br />Required <br />Variance .04 ac <br />(.lOac**) <br />** Excluding driveway serving neighbors <br />The proposed dividing line was apparently located as <br />presented for a number of reasons: <br />A) The proposed line leaves exactly 25% hardcover in <br />the 75-250' zone for the existing development on Lot 1. <br />B) This line also leaves a setback of approximately <br />7' to the driveway serving the existing residence. <br />Applicant feels such a setback is appropriate and <br />necessary to maintain the character of his property. <br />Consequently» Lot 2 ends up 0.04 acre short of 1 acre. <br />Technically* the subdivision code definition of <br />requires exclusion of vehicular easements from the defined <br />lot area. Although applicant has not provided documentation <br />of existing easements on the survey* staff must presume t a <br />an access easement exists over proposed Lot 2 to <br />residences at 1330 and 1350 Vine Place. The paved area of <br />that private driveway is approximately 2,800 s.f. <br />acre* hence the defined proposed lot area for Lot 2 is O.su <br />acre or less. <br />whether this driveway makes the northerly and southerly <br />portions of Lot 2 non-contiguous. <br />The probable building site on Lot 2 is north of the easement <br />driveway, mostly In the 250-500' hardcover rone. « <br />250-500' zone for Lot 1 was expanded to make Lot i s Z5U <br />500' zone conform to hardcover limits* the proposed dividing <br />line would move south about 65'. On the other hand* if the <br />250-500* hardcover variance for Lot 1 is granted# with the <br />proposed dividing line* Lot 2 would have ample hardcover <br />allowance to develop a residence within the hardcover <br />limits. <br />m <br />mmm^mm <br />M/m <br />Ki•WTi!mm <br />. >71 <br />t <br />: <br />my <br />... ■'■■mmm.y <br />y- y ' <br />:=-:7"V'' • .<. <br />4:.77>- <br />wm'-j : mm. ..m <br />i -A <br />mk <br />.; .K- <br />> vv,.; <br />■-■■ •■ . 7 . ■\v.: <br />^ .'V .: • v .4/--. ^ <br />m