Laserfiche WebLink
v:'j: r'vr.rl* v/>f.:' • •.,.iii».'wM-m-'’:mpiiyMsa*-V ■•w':*;' <br />Zoning Administrator <br />Bay Road North - <br />ered, 5 acres <br />:cessory building to <br />than the principal <br />Sion 9 (D) <br />required setbacks <br />structureSf but <br />■t is to be located <br />>al building on the <br />proposed garage is <br />ot be visible from <br />on between small <br />i in regards to the <br />proposed garage in <br />ring properties and <br />rty» technically a <br />te proposed location <br />constructed in 1985. <br />jrvey» technically a <br />that structure, but <br />ent trip to the site <br />irn location appears <br />t line of the house <br />t the barn does meet <br />>nt lot line and the <br />5d by a new survey. <br />U00 <br />m <br />F:--..-;- • -V ...^,Vf. <br />a;.. sv.::'■■■ <br />9:>ry ‘- .V <br />mmi <br />mm^s-kkkm <br />\ ‘ J!':. ' : ii <br />m .r ■..mmnxr^xv.-*i.: <br />k: <br />mmm::'-:pPSf <br />* <br />'V- Im!.■.•• •' '/'.'Zoning File #1423 June 12, 1989 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Staff RecoaBsendation - <br />Staff would recommend approval of the variance to Section <br />10.03, Si^division 9 (D), based on the finding that the proposed <br />garage will not be visible from neighboring properties and has no <br />visual Impact on the surrounding neighborhood. <br />(Does Planning Commission feel that the code should be <br />amended to allow accessory structures nearer the front lot line <br />than the principal building on large parcels of a given minimum <br />lot area?) <br />^ : ’ <br />#il :'-ky: <br />>kkk\jr <br />jvf-y- • .-.xr.' <br />:T' ■■ ;p:.S-V- '• '■V?? <br />H. ■ -a^vi: ;.M.s i <br />■:, XX....,; <br />mmktkikm <br />m.:k, <br />• .X.. <br />??XX' XS.xVx, <br />mk^mk : ■ k m <br />mrnmm <br />;•.' ^- ' •■'i:- iij-t <br />L i...V <br />! ■ <br />.r;y»^v-y^\. <v«d <br />kkkkkmm^k:,:- <br />4^^. ?-v .i-- :• <br />o.i.m <br />. . . --v <br />7ii • <br />p- <br />m' <br />f \ <br />LA.' •. '; . .VS•1 ■ : ' ; v j <br />'X ■ -; .i1■ '>W-\... <br />5f-'