06-19-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ELD AOGOST 15, 1988sociates, was present ! to a letter he had Mr. Barr's, opposing r, which spelled out I's reasons included arage, Mr. Barr has a jno has ordinances for the purpose of ■/as seeking in his nd 3-car garage that jived approval in the "^in that loft when it truct a second garage His proposal is to a the existing garage like to rebuild the Ld also be a wall for .p area above the new j*ed for attaching an :e that exceeds 1,000 e existing garage and another with a 10' lowever may result in s. One would be to ould allow it to be Id save the trees, ambitious. He asked iables addressed the ssic cars that are ids living space for and is frequently 3ing that Mr. Barr's the existing garage dship would be that ill result in the torage. Mr. Gables hardships in this be the depreciation trees. Mr. Gables lint of damage to the ly pleasing. Plan A )ff of the land. It hardcover. Plan B removal of several h runoff as well as MJJTOTES OF raS PLAHBIHG COMaSSIOH . I TIH6 HELD A06UST 15, 1988• iM--' *S0HIH6 FILE *1315 COST] The applicants were present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that this was a request for a setback and height variance for a monument that exceeds the allowed 3 1/2* height. Mr. Phil Miller stated that he was comfortable with the findings and recommendations o€ the City regarding their proposal. They are proposing to "dress up" the intersection of Willow and Countryside. The Homeowner's Association has never been satisfied with the appearance of that area. The variance would allow them to erect curved brick walls on each side of the intersection and light fixtures on top of each end post. The end posts will exceed 3 1/2*. He was hopeful that staff would confirm that the monuments were clearly outside of the 30* triangle and should create no visibility problems. He understood that if the road is maintained by the City in the future, there would be City snow plows on the road and a hold harmless agreement would need to be drafted. Kelley assumed that the City had initially approved Countryside Road and the issue of the island was not brought up at that time. Mabusth disagreed, stating that correspondence in the file would show that the City would not guarantee that the island could remain should the City take over the Road. Countryside Road is currently classified as a public dedicated roadway and once it connects with Old Crystal Bay Road, it will be maintained by the City. Mr. Miller stated that he understood that the City of Orono and each of the homeowners had extensive communications with the original developer. The City and the Homeowner's Association have similar feelings as to the Community in that regard. They want to go forward and make the area as attractive as possible. Their proposal should meet all of the required safety standards and they wanted the Planning Commission to act as staff recommended. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval, of the^Tequi^d variances, per staff recommendations and requirements. Motion, J(yqs*6, Nays«0, Motion passed. #1316 GARY BARR 3034 CASCO POIRT ROAD VARIAHCBS PUBLIC BBARIB6 8:58 P.M _The Affidavit of Pub. noter :10 P.M. oation and Certificate of Mailing were Ml mm. m- ■ ? i'Jkmmmr-m: mm- V:‘;;v ^ -fclisiais:; Hi U: :u' av. x:4'• •»: mm:'• : V. ■ ■ ' -'aa '■ - ■ ■ .*■; '! . . . : aVM"a j EM mm ixi