03-20-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

..'i'l l vm^m- y«:•.; :v fe::'.'":.:' < ■ -i.v tuM: ::ng Administrator auer, North Perndale Road lie Hearing rora the northeast corner v-v=== v:-->s*.:>Vv-^./:■:/,: ,V^:,^;.,>:::::;;g^:r 'S''!V,.; • . ■■■■■>• # .i . ■ proposed lot is from the westward along the north to the plat map). would appear to be dry n the north to the southr 1^ be located along that will be needed. of this property due to ic survey has not been tes that such a survey ■ryyy:MH^£y^-:yy.^ - xmy:;pim- ^.yy y - 'xyyxxyymm ■.•a ‘■-■.4"' ■■•■':. . .,1Mlilirf tyxy-y m01- V:i.mmy-ixyrsv^V : ;^vV#JL ^ V/ vr ,:>v> : ■■'•i'-vrifi-yym The applicants' site evaluator has indicated feasible sites for both primary and alternate drainfield systems. Those sites are located centrally on the lot nlong the east boundary line. (See Exhibit H) Both the primary and alternate sites require mound systems, and the slopes at the proposed sites range from 2% to 4%, well within the acceptable range for mound systems. The general drainage direction within the area of the mound sites would appear visually to be parallel to the east lot line, hence neither the proposed house development nor proposed septic systems should have any runoff effect on the neighboring Hauser property to the east. :r£rfyy; A Care will have to be taken to direct surface run-off around the drainfield sites, and given the proposed house location on the septic design plan, the location of the drainfield sites places a relatively severe restriction on the proposed house location. Again, careful site planning will be necessary to Insure that the natural flow of overland drainage in addition to the run-off from the house development does not affect the septic system. Note that the proposed division creates a "flag" type lot, with a corridor 60' in width running about 230' before the lot widens out. This requires a lot width variance, since the defined width of this property will be 60' where a 200' width is normally required. Note also that the lot is 320' in east/west width at its widest point and -ctually contains more than 2 acres in just the area south of the narrow corridor. |i*l| myymm A, ry&xmi m:A ■ ■ - : S - ■ m-:'; / ■ yyx': .my ■ V As you can see from the plat map, staff has sketched in the location of the private easement road which currently serves eight total residences. This would he the ninth residence served by that road. Staff has sketched in on your plat map the location of that road, and would note that the private road is approximately 2,100' in length to the end of the loop at the west end. Staff would also note that the parcel from which this lot is to be divided is approximately 930' in width and comprises approximately 14.1 acres. This is the City's opportunity to initiate an appropriate dedication for private road purposes on this 14 acre parcel. Staff would recommend that the developer be required in his proposed plat to show a 25' wide by 930' long outlot at the north side of the property for private road purposes. Note that =the survey indicates that private easements exist presumably for access purposes to neighboring properties, in a corridor 16.5' south and north of the north lot line of the parcel in question. Also note that the plat of Fairway View to the west has a plat road outlot width of 50' on the north/south portion, but 30' on the east/west portion. That plat was completed in 1977. The outlot road parcel on the plat of Fairway View is currently owned by the owner of Lot 5. : ^ f. . i--.-' ri - , ;• ■. . •. ■ • i •• . . • ,1 ; . •* • H ym mmmHim m yx:m • . ■••••- •iv ■ ;k\. yy-.y. . ' V.vu:;: . ‘. ■ • ♦ •• 1 yyyyyM