My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-20-1989 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1989
>
03-20-1989 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2023 3:56:17 PM
Creation date
11/9/2023 1:10:52 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
way and house location was ad the septic Information^ single drawing, and noted <br />In general, the proposed <br />he septic system and the <br />o conflicts with the araln- <br />lon that with careful and <br />be resolved. <br />taff would note that when <br />j contours, we would expect <br />lit foresee major filling <br />way, which may affect the <br />upon the applicant to make <br />b the neighboring property <br />when a building permit is <br />uction, staff would expect <br />ound drainfield systems. <br />Ltted signatures from the <br />less issue, although these <br />prior to this writing. <br />I submit that information <br />f September 14th. Staff <br />wings Including a 25' road <br />he existing country club <br />rhis will provide the next <br />known as "Fairway view" to <br />r lot width, since this is <br />asements would have to be <br />1 be subject to a park fee <br />the City requires that a <br />staff Sec <br />-»K A.mzm ■ U . A'Zoning Pile #1326 March 16, 1989 Page 3 of 3it is^8tTf\'V’oc^/n?on”^^ coiments regarding drainage concerns.However^ proposed lot is a viable building site,ever, caj^ful site planning will be necessary to ensure that conflicts <br />thoH^o house, driveway, septic system, and the grading associated with <br />conflict with each other nor cluse problems for <br />Staff would suggest that a condition of plat <br />the requirement for a final grading plan prior to issuance of a <br />Eniinir? plan to be reviewed and approved by the City <br />retentiln Commission may wish to recommend that the <br />building permit ^ associated easement be completed prior to issuance of a <br />datlon - <br />the .ubdlvl.lon aubj.ct to <br />kr ?:=rcf‘VroVt.;;”„‘rpSbirc ‘ <br />con/tVu«®.'V'J;'lif??‘"®.f''? f’®"'**?® recommendstion, applicant shall <br />bSlldlno^Jrmtl property prior to Issuance of atiding permit for a house on the property, and grant the necessarv <br />drainage easement for same in the final plat drawings. ^ <br />of a^bSuSno site grading plan prior to issuance <br />linar.*uMlvillcn «" ‘•'® <br />drawiJgsf^^*^ drainage and utility easement shall be shown on the plat <br />e;sement”?«?e “?J iSeWt;.««<3 «"<5 ®«Uty <br />final note, the drainage concerns expressed by the neighbors <br />regarding development of this property may very well be leoitlmate <br />concerns, however, creation of the retention basin on this pLcertt wou^d <br />dlve'looieSt^o/Jh?''^®^® intensification of the problem as I result if <br />this property, if in fact there is a drainage problem in <br />development of this property, the appropriate <br />f KK that would be for the residents to pititiin for a <br />neighborhood drainage study independent of this subdivision approval. <br />I A,'m
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.