Laserfiche WebLink
••«r w5 i«aa:,.. ’it"«•&iyivr^tffx ^’mmils. ■ ,;^XXX>'• * u-' <br />■F^ <br />ning Administrator <br />m-m <br />ive r<2viewed the currently <br />3, monumer.ts and gateways, <br />ructurp.i. are occasionally <br />jw or old subdivision, <br />r or ol^ subdivision. <br />1-3 persons. <br />tur general terns that often <br />mmm <br />SsX-'-.’ :lXii <br />■ .r X.... i.;,-.X--:X;;!v; X..' <br />m^mm^» <br />=■-• <br />/alls are: <br />non-encroachment" section# <br />are allowed up to 3*j' high <br />akeshore lots along major <br />rricted by Section 10. <‘2# <br />Low any structure within 75* <br />nces and walls. . .up to a <br />t no fence or wall higher <br />erage lakeshore setback", <br />constructed within the 75' <br />illy states that accessory <br />o a rear lot line, but that <br />hu in a rear yard. <br />es that a 10' setback is <br />a side yard and no fence or <br />cceed 6’ in height. <br />.i> <br />k' X <br />"■fe:. <br />r <br />Mi <br />mmmm '............iW^WM - *i..U3-r. <br />-••1 <br />IP <br />Pillars, Entry Monuments & Gateways <br />December 29, 1988 <br />Page 2 cf 5 <br />Additional code sections dealing with various aspects of this issue <br />are as follows: <br />1. Section 6.01, Definition of Private Road and Private Driveway. <br />2. Section 6.07 makes it illegal to place signs or other structures <br />in right-of-way of a public street or private road. <br />3. Section 10.02 zoning code definitions of: <br />— Accessory use or structure (Definition #1) <br />- Building (Definition #12) <br />- Signs (Definitions #58 through 64) <br />- Structure (Definition 69) <br />4. Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 deals with accessory buildings (note <br />that most entryway gates and monuments would not fit the definition of <br />a building). Also, Subdivision 16 deals with corner lots and traffic <br />visibility. <br />5. Section 10.61 - "Special Provisions," Subdivision1 deals with <br />sign standards and requirements. <br />6. Section 10.75 - "Height of Structures," Subdivision 1_J.E1 suggests <br />that "monuments" are an item that could be allowed a 50% increase in <br />height under a conditional use permit. At issue is whether this <br />monument terminology is intended to apply to entry pillars. <br />issues - <br />The following would appear to be general Issues to be addressed in <br />formulating a policy or ordinance amendment regarding pillars and gates: <br />A) Should pillars or monuments be allowed flanking existing or new <br />cublic roads? (a recent example is the Brown Road entrance to Webber <br />Hills); flanking new or existing private roads? (a recent example is <br />• Countryside Drive); or should they be allowed flanking <br />private driveways? (recent examples are Gumucio on West Ferndale, <br />Azahari on Fox Street, and Halley Homes/Terry on Kelly Avenue). <br />B) For pillars and "wing walls", what should be the maximum height of <br />pillar or wall, what should be the maximum dimensions of light <br />fixtures above such structures, what setbacks should be required from <br />property lines? <br />C) Should there be limitations on the type of lighting used with such <br />structures? <br />D) What should be the minimum clearance between pillars (with or <br />without a gate)? <br />. • ■: ■; . 'V.: <br />; - I- <br />X,-., . ■ <br />'■ . \ <br />■