03-20-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ir . • J{i^:^.> Vf-:vK:iif=^v:^v:,-^;-:;.Joning Administrator Non-encroachments ion July 1988 ng Pences/Non-encroachments 7//9/88 ed by Planning Commission on was held. At that meeting, tblic present and he was in .1 fences. hat meeting felt that this id additional time to review mat to a standardized format iq deleted. That format is nmended four revisions to the rdlng property line setback osed to be changed to 10* rd. e term "major thoroughfare" ows; "major thoroughfare" - on, a major thoroughfare is State and Federal highway, :ity roads. (These Include: reet and County Road 6; 2. ad 6 and from the Long Lake Jillow Drive to Brown Road; en County Road 6 and County er Mr. Hollander's request, Ey that all fences legally the ordinance be allowed to ;aff, but can be added if »pt cf "grandfathering" such zoning law that is adopted, ecessary. ^ r C'* ••• ■ c '..iV ' : h ■' ■' ■ V: ■fmm mmiiiiiwi #v j!m u 1^?^. .iJV-Lsi msmm mm ¥mi me' W mmm- T-1;:.V.;;mm,-.-,.- ■ •r;-'.-^ ::. ■,.r-V:..V-./■• f; . ■- ■ -V-*-:. '■■■^ ..■-i:/ >:■■' ■. "-r. '/>■■■■:; :v■■ " ;-■« mm" -3 . ♦hV- is.f^mm Zoning Code Amendment - Fence Height/Non-encroachments March 16, 1989 Page 2 of 2 4. Planning Commission expressed a concern regarding whether the proposed standards were acceptable to accommodate large animal fencing, i.e. horse fencing. Staff has not as of this writing checked into the fence heights necessary to contain horses, however, it is likely that the 54" (4%') height limit will not cause problems. This can be checked into if you so desire. Staff Recommendation - Staff would recommend that Planning Commission review the existing and proposed language of the non-encroachment section, and specify which sections, if any, require additional review. If Planning Commission is comfortable with the wording as proposed, a recommendation for adoption would be appropriate. ■•7. ’tf- : . ...?L • mm: ■ ■•yiwc --mm ■K' V:-