Laserfiche WebLink
ixi ■ -i ■ ^:’-i ■ P i=-^■r^ •>;;. . ■ . jr ■ v / ,mmmftSfS*'^'4aK-i :-•• Vvaccess <br />Administrator <br />nt <br />ti initiated review of <br />performance standards <br />structures exceeding <br />se." As a result of <br />part of the review <br />i to include not only <br />tion of accessory and <br />jhout the residential <br />ussions has probably <br />flection staff feels <br />mit further immediate <br />ares as a conditional <br />.anguage and have made <br />ioption, then it might <br />broader concerns that <br />and hardcover in non­ <br />subsection "Q" to the <br />all other residential <br />Conditional Dses. <br />nts: <br />lot. <br />setbacks, but in no <br />from a side or rear <br />qualify <br />irementally allowed a <br />than the principal <br />WMMmmmm <br />mmSMs&n-rvm <br />fei/-'-. - Vi <br />• S’i{ yjo- V'V; •• <br />Wj, ■.{;•■ •' •■; <br />E>^ -mi <br />ti, . . . <br />I"'"'- ■■■■ <br />‘ v- • - ^ :"rM <br />y. • . ■■*# <br />Oversire Accessory Structures Zoning AmendmentJune 30, 1988 Page 2 of 2*. so .ubdlvi.ion =■■> Pj*« “* «fi “°Sy1S'Vpp ” ,°."d\n°-hrcS''?Si <br />rrrb:^Tot'^"bf4'«.‘\%?u7r%i”ornr=” s.tb.cb..o,t <br />be maintained. <br />7. T.nni. court., Pool. »d p.ddccb. over l,00^ <br />principal structure setbacks or are aucijewu <br />Permit if they don’t. <br />The proposed l«9 “Me .1.0 .li»in.te. the <br />‘t£t :rcVpVio\%".%**?iro:eVi!.‘?n,^^\''.%r« -..-i <br />square feet without limitation. <br />Pie... b. ““‘Vr.'ll'^of’ th" «”\r^lelfo™;n«\t»5«d; <br />accessory structure *^3^ pLmi^t. Milking the oversize accessorymust be granted its Conditional use ^er city's ability to deny <br />teUcture ordinance this 2P//,^3^^,"^3Ve it^nd^^^^^^ For that Reason, itaff ha. <br />such a structure when ™ proposals. The June 29, <br />reduced the Q-acre lot could have a 5,000 square foot1987 memo *“99e8ted that a 10 acre 1^ .quare feet. Likewise <br />rr-:*cr7 l‘’ot‘rii -n»v*lori\ r%^c£.‘nd.d « b£e l.-0^.,u.« J..b <br />“JiTrfUriity "”uld°B°inT.*v. Wulr^J .' V.ri.nc. b...d on the proposed <br />ordinance language. <br />Please review the proposed Given that a number of <br />make a recommendation to the have* been referred to you by the <br />additional proposed ordinance ®"®''^®?r your recommendation on this <br />council, it would be ^VVr?priate to finalxze you^^ planning <br />rcri“?on “.o'r,i%%Sry'ou^:ey “.Ke a reco^^^^^^ <br />iTi.iTt co..i..ion <br />for review.