03-20-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

iSjMSij's-//.Jministrator Place - ng )ack variance required for 3 story deck must meet the f 50'. The previous deck s. No record of a permit confirm that the deck was zoning) of house construction mmm im oKsem: •W, *n &c;ftidiioi:,.:’ »■; Jte' > ^vr x'UX:. ”‘d mr\ -5 :% ich: mimm^m ,.;<r' .v=^ k my y-yym ^mmm mM I; V/. • . > . V . '.I :r ;■ . ■ ■';« ^ -I s?:' -V . rnyy-':y. itl h . :k■ ^:' >m-Uv ,.: > ;;mm,rr3!SS„^ ^ ■• SWSt^'''• • • ‘ jt'*yv: ■■ --.'.; •.' . ’ -iv *iia^ 'i.'M ?5l-' iW?:»■■ ;:..4 wmsM mma #• ■>:' ■’i ••’IS % im -i 4 ■■• + V- ^'': m IrT-^ •«V I 1« mmm * ■ P: m':5.. mmh-\■m'-mnZoning File #1387 March 14, 1989 Page 2 of 3History of the Zoning of the Property - At the time of the platting of the Swan Lake Subdivision, the minimum standard for the area was 25,000 s.f. in area with 120* required width at the building line. In April of 1969 when the house was constructed on the property, the property was zoned R-IC requiring a minimum of 1 acre, 140* of width, 35' front setback, 30' rear setback, and 10' side setbacks. The house conformed to all current setback standards. It is not clear to sta as to why an area variance would not have been required prior to the construction but there is no record of an area variance being granted. In 1975, the property was rezoned to 2 acres with the current standards of 50' front and rear and 30' side setbacks. There is no record of a building permit being issued for the former deck which was probably built sometime in the early 1970's. Staff has photographs of the previous deck that conformed to the sketch submitted by applicant (review Exhibit E). The applicant rebuilt the deck without a building permit because she was not aware that a building permit was required. The present deck conforms pretty much to the design and extent of the former deck except that the deck along the rear of the house has been extended to the east corner. The new deck is located H'4" from the rear lot line whereas the previous deck was located approximately 14' from the rear lot line. Staff has received no negative comments from the neighbors notified for this review. The deck requires no other variances nor does it Impact upon any of the existing improvements (note Exhibit F, location of septic tanks and drainfield area to the west and south of the residence). Findings and Hardships Cited by Applicant - 1. Unusual shape of lot 2.House located on lot prior to existing zoning (principal structure met zoning standards at the time of construction in 1969). Location of house on lot and interior floor plan restricts construction of deck on east and south side of residence structure. >:k:::/:vViXV;vV: i I-:." •if m-m • .- . mm■ftv.,.-''S* fe#"- ': -.y. ... . •• . y| S •Iiilfl mu Wmmymy ^ " •V'.-.r = - •fM-SSI P. ' '♦v v:, mm '"m f.v WC': I mmm ' A, -• m i.mm. .-J a»^K'; yy-; V - n. -: "A mi 1 ■V-. A;- i-. .-A.v;f ^ j S .*' • •f-j -t "iy-- ■ %:. -r- ■ .■■• ■ .i"' "■ymmy. Kl*. .mmy:.-' pt} vy^m- mm ■.mrnmymrm I • m. -.;V^