Laserfiche WebLink
wwis&smmiff’■ ^ ;:•^WV1^t5^^t.««;.•fc.. '■-f^.::y.wMmMMMis.p. Revised <br />Procosal <br />l/«33 (25.1%) <br />4,940 (31.9%) <br />0 (0%) <br />1,893 (12.2%) 15,498 <br />6,833 <br />22.0%30,998 <br />» far enough east on the <br />ntVlnYnrth^M^ <br />ver to the east, west and <br />tlon of a driveway backup <br />e house, results In a net <br />The hardcover Is more proposal <br />led to save will end up <br />“PFllcants had <br />plan*indicate whether that <br />the Planning Commission <br />»>iV MS;'v,.ii«eS0M ■tf <br />Planning Commission <br />from the northerly 0-75' <br />■ly 0-75' zone. This Is <br />I to the neighborhood In <br />* Minnetonka. <br />1 V <br />wmm <br />'si/ <br />»* K' <br />4 <br />.y^- > v:: ■Vv-v-v/ ' :vf <br />m ■'} <br />ii... <•; .•■ V’“, <br />n ^,""®«®« In <^he 75-250* zone is justified by emovals In the 0-75 zone. All of the proposed hardcover la <br />necessary to preserve substantial property rights of the owners. <br />the TctuVl o7 V appropriate given that <br />*. S i®^® anjoyad by neighboring property <br />increase as a result of removal of the <br />****“*** ^J^^hermore, encroachment of the proposed house <br />•^•*^*9* setback line is necessary to preserve an <br />t«to«d “JJdencj!' •'1“°“* r.-d..i,„l„g th« <br />for ®^® «^on*i*tent with variances granted <br />in rile” yea°rs.'’ ^^aa^^iances in the Baldur Park neighborhood <br />lirroun^if P«^°Pa*^ty In relation to the <br />i**/ ■“9ga*ts that the residence must be <br />o^dli^to •,"** ^ni^ther from the road Inbenefit from the northerly view of the lake, and <br />therefore requires a longer driveway. * <br />I ‘ V • <br />approval is forthcoming. Planning Commission should consider including the following conditions of approval: <br />1. Removal of all hardcover Items noted by applicant as belna proposed for removal on the revised plan. app^icanr as nelng <br />ilBHHlpnp <br />.I.**..*.: ‘ <br />Hit •*. •• - <br />tl landowners Is due to circumstances uniqueto their property and were not created by the landowner. ^ <br />g) Granting of the variances requested will not t-um, <br />essential character of the locality. <br />findlnoi**7^"« ComniBgion wishes to deny the application, opposite <br />“co«e2itlor in your <br />further Information or revision, if this option Is <br />npplicMt cl.ar dlr.ctl™ what <br />foundV?<*,fn^KT^v®^4.®^®^^ *2® to grade the area of the removed <br />EnglrfeeV. ^ original contours, as verified by the City