02-21-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ding permit to build the lo staff advised that the Approximately 20* of land ides the east lot line of 5 ty) from the shoreline of It and in consideration of signating 20* wide vacated le DNR the possibility that rangement to create a new at the shoreline meet the also advised by staff that ial in light of previous advised that the only lot the City involved the lever the creation of a new (line was satisfied. Sisk Bd the property to be once mits had ever been issued Unfortunately, Sisk used Lots 5, 6 and 7 and as a sued. Staff received word s review that the previous Lined a permit from the DNR (review Exhibits K t 0). > Rask and it would appear rty at that time, had not project had an impact on Creek Watershed District property and 20* of Lot 4 iparlan to Lake Minnetonka nsidered an improvement of ursue his rights regarding Brian access with the DNR. this point in the review. ; :V v» 2 X3, Bant letters of concern or nts. The canal that was *s recollection but those nember the lagoon and the r the previous owner ever '.V - •!, • • •• j •• •■■vv -V-riV-' : / mm ’ ■* '•• •' •• ': :E":' ^ ■.mm3:- - .r :•A:.. .3-r-, ■.■mmX: . ^Zoning File #1370 February 17, 1989 Page 3 of 3severlf* Mi*ch«jS‘haV'klndirvolSntMr^ thJ'® *"^"5 «ubject shoreline arePlanning Ccnmaisslon membere fro r-mr-y ••rvlces of his driveway for Will better understand what th^v Iri »embers «ur..„. I, you tl.rto vi.it VU JS! Ch.Jl-”t “ ! •"'»Pl.e. and t«k« th. fir.t right at \h« 'fir.t dtiv«lyr' Optioas of Action Available to Planning CtMissioo - Table pending final resolve of riparian rights of property. To deny subdivision application based on the following findingsi A) The Sisk property is not riparian to Lake Minnetonka. 1. 2. ?ot pi; ^ .ubstandard riparian Strelow Permananfr Dock - thrw y..r.r It aho“d alio n<f <S«k» for th. ,..t« Permit from th® dnr t-n ^ that Straloi# should have applied for both State, LMCD and Municipal irdliailM.^ conformance with € r: ■ ' ■■■'‘!t