Laserfiche WebLink
ft h. <br />ng Administcator <br />ad - <br />sewered <br />re setback variances to <br />house <br />^ateraent <br />Jcovec Calculations <br />Cook Dated February 15, <br />use Location <br />L residence and guest <br />;ed only by a concrete <br />,o structures with a <br />ng the owner s master <br />location being approved by <br />October 1963). <br />L.9%. Although the room <br />[cover (since it is over <br />ts wish to create a 400 <br />the 0-75’ zone. ahis <br />le proposal, and notes <br />a single structure of <br />rainage concerns. Cook <br />to indicate how runoff <br />ends of the house. <br />' < . > <br />■i •• <br />■; <br />v: <■■■ s •'i? <br />s.' • <br />-1 <br />•r-- * <br />rF-w ■.••T Zoning File 11382 February 16, 1989 Page 2 of 2 <br />•' <br />5. Technically. no’’iulble''ceside^nce buildlnga <br />setback variance. However, north, and the residence to <br />on the Camp Teko ‘ Neither neighboring property will <br />fo'se’llj «l«!n| fa" fuws* beLnse o£ this project. <br />“‘““?!irse review the «t«..ent o£ t 3,^„a_^j.ardBM^^^ <br />tSI%^"4lfSfcfn%7derfd ‘%rfhf‘tecturally signiticant. <br />^ W W « V ------- ^ <br />. .t. r*itv to qrant variances to <br />Since it would be .. the 0-^75' zone, the question <br />Increase the percentage Reasonably be removed to result inremains, which areas of hardcover could reas^ y perhaps even an <br />It least no net harcover increase in ^o the staff hardcover <br />overall decrease i" *g iJng and narrow, comprising nearly 900review, the deck near the lake is long « ^ stairway and a <br />square feet in area. That deck has t^^^ Removal of the blacktop path and <br />blacktop path that averages 5 in _„v ^ r^^rtainlv accomplish an overall <br />reJerUng^t to natural ^*9®"®^^°" a%?I^ sloped paved <br />slight decrease in hardcover, ^s^ can suggest other hardcover that <br />-ilfL^’frofed iffhf?-f?cfnf\r'tfe ^abhwnfis not temoved. <br />__ ^ fl^ 1^ <br />Note that the residence has no Is’^a garage, <br />is a detached storage building that apparently ca <br />Options For Planning Commission Action <br />Planning Commission has the following options.ing uwiiuuxia,^------- <br />1. Recommend approval based on ‘he hardships no^d^a^^^^^^ <br />applicant's letter of iPP"%°ierns and conditions: <br />Commission should address the removed, if any, from the 0-75 <br />-ne,rd^\tch"iferof review <br />by thfcT“'s«fffrio'’? tofevl«of this application by the City <br />Council.XX* <br />^;provllf"p«1.apTa"fowin"g t"h^^ddft^of bu%"dTsfl"lowfg'the proposed <br />terrace hardcover• <br />Recommend denial, making findings that support denial. <br />Jlease%^-fppuclnf f r\ct\of aflf Shat “ddufona’f Inforfatf <br />required. <br />Other. <br />in <br />.• i • - --v:.. ...v: -J <br />■ : • : • ................ ... . .. -■_... J <br />' ?m