Laserfiche WebLink
mmf: <br />I Renoval of 326 s.f. <br />' principal structure <br />•er balcony <br />level stairs not included <br />ory balcony hardcover) <br />is no need for variance <br />:ructlon Within 0-75' <br />cetch <br />'als <br />tmssm <br />■ :m. . -v-.mix-, - iixsimn <br />iili <br />tJ,.-: .•■■■■:•.'. . <br />. . .‘^. .*..*- *.• * * *. <br />.4?-.'. ■ . ■■•■»?< ........\£:- : <br />i'.'i ■■• .V ■ • • . ■ .'1 <br />^mm:Li <br />^ .V,' <br />■..;J v'i ■■'. • >-^.. ->y:: ■., ^ <br />X-K <br />j <br />. •--■••• ■• <br />P^l^PSiSW <br />«PiSSPSiii <br />\ •"■ •'•. <br />M <br />mt-- ■ ■ <br />Si:" <br />Zoning Pile #1381 February 15» 1989 Page 3 of 4 .m:: ■■ ■-.:-'y-yid • A'' ■-•■'''■hf I y . ..y- ify-.r^: ' :. mf :V- >. .Rersiew of Application -The applicant proposes complete reconstruction of residence structure <br />on the site using only the existing foundation located approximately 61* <br />from the lakeshore setback area. In order to meet the hardcover allowance <br />of 25% within the 75-250* setback area, the applicant proposes the removal <br />of the existing detached garage and a re-location of a trimmed back access <br />drive with backout strip. Approximately 212 s.f. of new structure is <br />proposed within the 0-75' setback area. Applicant proposes the removal of <br />326 s.f. in order to offset the excess of hardcover at 15.18% existing. <br />The applicant proposes a total reduction of 114 s.f. of hardcover within <br />the 0-75' setback area. <br />The reconstructed residence will now be totally located behind the 61* <br />setback area with a 2' upper story deck extending another 2' into the <br />lakeshore protected area at 59'. The previous principal structure was set <br />at 55' with an accessory staircase located 10* from the lakeshore. <br />Issues for Ccmslderation - <br />Is the proposal consistent with similar improvement variance <br />applications (review Exhibit J s K)7 In consideration of the Palm <br />application at similar lot area and width standards, the Rhode <br />application has less hardcover than approved in the Palm application. <br />17.5% <br />Palms t <br />0-75* ' <br />Rhode: <br />0-75' - 13.3% <br />75-250* - 29% <br />75-250* - 24.8% <br />Are there specific features or functions of the Improvement plan that <br />could be improved upon or amended? <br />Have the improvements in structural setbacks from the lake and <br />hardcover reductions offset the 212 s.f. of new structural hardcover <br />within the 0-75* setback area? <br />Based on the conclusions drawn from the dlscussi <br />factual findings presented by applicant and staff li <br />following options of action are available to the Plannin <br />?■=■ 'i-'.mrnmmim <br />■mfmk <br />■fi <br />. yyy: : :iiy . <br />It'v : •; }r; •••V