My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-21-1989 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1989
>
02-21-1989 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2023 1:00:48 PM
Creation date
11/8/2023 12:52:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. 1'*Mr- A -T'ttc.-jwv*-k' *■ ^ ' <br />V . . »• “ V <br />:.imm' A •;^ I <br />• /'/• ..\-."rv•.. ». r .V <br />cy" <br />•1 <br />-♦ ' ■> >J <br />..^oi <br />m\- <br />k-1 <br />•te^%‘iiiy <br />ly <br />« ■ > <br />. j. a- <br />■ <br />Planning Cossnisalon Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator BernhardsonJeanne A. Mabusth, Building i Zoning Administrator <br />February 15, 1989 <br />Sobjeeti #1381 Jack F. Rhode, 1690 Shadywood Road <br />Variances - Public Hearing <br />Fertiaent Facts/Ordiaances -> <br />Total AreaI <br />Required ■ 21,780 s.f. <br />Existing - 17,700 s.f. or .81 acres <br />tot Width: <br />Required ■ 100* <br />At Lakeshore - 82.9' or 82% <br />At Building Line - 80' or 80% <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 - Lakeshore Setback Variance. <br />Required for new construction outside of defined existing <br />building envelope (beyond existing foundation). <br />Required « 75' <br />Existing Principal Structure - 55* <br />Existing Accessory - 10' <br />Proposed Principal ■ 61' <br />Proposed Accessory - 59' (Second level deck extends 2* <br />beyond lake front of principal residence, steps at <br />lower level extend 14") <br />Variance: <br />Principal Structure -14' or 18.6% <br />Accessory Structure ■ 16' or 21% <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Hardcover variance required within 0- <br />75* for new construction. Although a reduction of 1.9% or 114 s.f. is <br />proposed, the City must address the need for the variance for the new <br />construction, consistent with previous reviews. <br />mmrn <br />h&ssm's ^ <br />a. <br />naSm:' <br />k' -4^ ■ <br />^ ' ■■ ■■^im■* M': ^'fli wsisaas <br />i:;; 3sa|g%#?§||*|ji <br />1 <br />mm <br />■ ■■■’a ■'
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.