Laserfiche WebLink
tning AdministratorWoodhill Road t <br />ipproved variance <br />to allow for the <br />t line. <br />f Easements <br />>n <br />are proposing to <br />08 square feet in <br />eage. <br />ront setbacks of <br />47' at the most <br />meeting the 50* <br />is an agreement <br />verifying that <br />the application. <br />of drainage and <br />essary to do so. <br />[»age and utility <br />Ly portion to be <br />Lde drainage and <br />, to maintain the <br />ents within the <br />i,v-. <br />In Resolution #2545|> the City Council approved a cantilevered 4' encroachment into the 26' wetland easement setback, but as a condition of that approval requried that the applicant acquire additional land so that the new lot line will allow for the SO' front setback. This application is for the fc^» pose of fulfilling <br />that requirement. <br />ri mf-f.-V. <br />....... <br />mm. <br />w^i;;'a <br />i 4i <br />i»i <br />iS <br />I- 'S, <br />mmm&m <br />k:-y- :-mmL <br />£' i 'M ilafeS '.'>i£g*!«K«.!ri <br />■:■■■ '■ 'y.:. ■ : " y. :/■ ■■: <br />* 'g'.- :■ ^ l:-• v’/ V^-; : V- <br />staff Reco—endation - <br />Each pre-*existIng property remains the same amount of acreage. <br />The proposed trade ’-*o££ has no effect on the existing driveway <br />serving the Prudden residence. The property line will still be <br />about 22* from the Prudden driveway. <br />This project appears to meet the conditions set forth in <br />Resolution #2545 and the general City requirements for <br />subdivision. Drainage and utility easements as noted above would <br />be an appropriate condition if Planning Commission recommends <br />approval. <br />vJ <br />'mmmmwirnym.mm <br />HM <br />i'SHv: w: <br />w :g£‘'-£c‘,5''V <br />■ .................................. <br />m *!»? <br />r. <br />rapp!£5^'-U:’’ =’m <br />mmm. <br />itis