Laserfiche WebLink
rnjm <br />xse optionally could be <br />:d setback line, which <br />75' lake setback. Due <br />is likely the tree in <br />( house behind the 0-75 ’ <br />ng in the 0-75* zone if <br />f the house is already <br />order to minimize the <br />:y Council have taken a <br />: zones to create walk- <br />Casco Point, in which <br />posed here) was created <br />to restore to original <br />plication on Fagerness <br />It to cut down his yard <br />c repairs, to create a <br />guests and the current <br />tie proposed cuts. From <br />cut should have only a <br />ir entering the lake. <br />e the revised driveway <br />ay grades are rather <br />apron would appear to <br />rage door. The whole <br />posed structures, the <br />proposed plan, and no <br />;ed by construction of <br />:he major increases of <br />the relative size of <br />i hardcover increases <br />cover on the property <br />amount of structural <br />e increase in the 75- <br />high end of what has <br />. proposed hardcover, <br />over, is proposed at <br />on Baldur Park (see <br />•• > <br />-i-'- '’'' l- <br />F ■ j <br />m <br />4’ <br />ri - <br />Zoning File #1363 <br />January 11, 1989 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />meet lakeshore setbacks, unless the garage was reoriented in its relation <br />ship with the proposed house. <br />Staff RecoflBendation - <br />Based on the above facts, comments, and observations, staff would make <br />the following recommendations; <br />1. Applicants should consider moving the proposed house further west <br />and south to attempt to more closely meet the required 75' <br />lakeshore setbacks. This requirement would be consistent with past <br />City practice in similar situations. <br />2. Applicants should consider removal of the existing garage and <br />excessive gravel Iriveway and reconfiguration of the proposed two-car <br />garage into perhaps a three-car garage in order to reduce the amount <br />of hardcover increase on the property. <br />3. The proposed cut to create a walk-out in the 0-75* zone would be <br />inconsistent with similar applications which have recently <br />by the City, although the magnitude of this request is relatively <br />minor compared to those other cases. <br />4. Preservation of mature trees on this property might be considered <br />as a reasonable hardship, because those trees help to soften the <br />potential vertical harshness of this construction as viewed from <br />across the lake. <br />5. The proposed fill generally occuring in the 75-250 zone is <br />apparently necessitated by the attempt to raise the house, thereby <br />eliminating a more severe walk-out cut, but resulting in what could be <br />a problem driveway situation. Retaining walls may be appropriate in <br />some areas. The garage could be lowered a few feet to help the <br />grading situation. Drainage must be directed down the lot lines ana <br />not on to neighboring properties. <br />Planning Commission is requested to either make a recommendation to <br />the City Council or to give applicants direction to revise the request ana <br />bring back an alternative site plan. <br />; ■ > ■ * <br />4 <br />■m <br />•1 hp'!'.- <br />r: <br />TY OF < <br />Initial . <br />($50.0 <br />Renewal ’ <br />(no ch. <br />Af tor-th< <br />PROPERTY <br />Site Add <br />Property <br />Please c <br />Attach 1 <br />required <br />APPLICAN <br />Nam <br />Add <br />t OWNER (1 <br />dbscript <br />Des <br />VARIANCE