Laserfiche WebLink
gf located more than 160' <br />verage lakeshore setback <br />: this point. Neither <br />t lake views across the <br />uestioned the City's <br />regarding the average, <br />ion of that section as <br />should be taken of the <br />on either sider and the <br />two distances. In fact, <br />at standard, if that was <br />ode section. However, <br />traight line between the <br />shewn in Erchihit 3 and <br />e regaraiess of actual <br />that ratatior <br />an informal conceptual <br />g Commission unanimously <br />ck by drawing a straight <br />sistency standpoint, but <br />D be appropriately and <br />y and to the existing <br />outh has a garage on its <br />. 1 be encroached upon by <br />th side of the subject <br />action, and the existing <br />bion already blocks any <br />blocked by the proposed <br />icent residence will be <br />Zoning File #1362 <br />January 11, 1389 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Staff Recoonendatii <br />•masm,A**'m <br />Prom a hardcover standpoint, the proposed 417 s.f. excess is quite <br />typical or even low for the Casco Point neighborhood. As a way to <br />visualize the seemingly high 68% hardcover in the 250-500* zone, consider <br />that if the 75-250' zone went all the way to the street, this property <br />would then have the equivalent of 29% hardcover in the 75-250' zone, with <br />virtually no hardcover in the 0-75' zone. Approval of this variance would <br />appear to be very consistent, being generally lesser in magnitude than <br />sifliilar variances granted on Casco Point in recent times. . • <br />Staff would recommend approval of the proposed hardcover and average <br />lakeshore setbacks, based on the following findings: <br />1. No significant lake views enjoyed by neighboring properties will <br />reduced cr encroached upon by the proposed additions. <br />Hardcover on the property is slightly excessive based on code <br />standards but is very consistent with other properties and variance <br />approvals in the Casco Point area. The proposed additions and <br />hardcover removals result in a hardcover increase of 417 s.f. There <br />does not appear to be excessive non-structural hardcover on the <br />property that can be easily removed without causing additional <br />hardships for use of the property. <br />mm <br />JT-