01-17-1989 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EX’HiSn bill VI SIun for iti»rf If Id hwi*Sl Qu4rtff of Sec I lull uiilf, NI lino sol« varttr of tot SoLthufst Qcfrltr IHI09 at a point 100.81 fact Cttt cf iho Porthwftt corntr of said irtli ;f03* Cast 3Jf fttt to to# l:(for«trly County toad Ko* 4S); laid ctRttrlInt to a point 878.8 Ina of said Soutbuast Qoarttr raid Portii llnth thanct Vast to imait Quartar cf toa Soctouast 1: 8aclnnlng at a point on too Vf! Lor of too SouUincst Ouarttr dist- la Porthvtst cornar of said !ouio* ilono said Watt llna c distanca of Its fatt: thanca aorta 439.314$ Lo tha point of baglnning; »tt Half of said Sotin«att Quar- laclnnlng at tha SovtliMfSt cornar Lharca aorta along tha watt lina cf itanca of 1340.1 raal ncra or las% luta of tha aorthMSt cornar of ica Cast parallal with taa South tar a distanca of 49$ faat: taanca t llna of said Soutanast Quartar ra cr lass to a point 878.82$ I of said Southwait Quartar; la South llna of said Scuthwast raat: taanca South parallel vita ifst Quartar to tha South line cf ?ca Vast along tha South llna of la point of beginning, aacapt r the electric Short Llna railway. 118 North. Nanga 23 Me ft of tha la clungad r«iHa:*. tha final nmr >rnil. INM. T7WC. Plann4r< 4 . t 1. “ . « * k, «4»^- % . • m. , W I • --w ^ ’1.* ' / f ¥ir». <m**99*" •f’ *r- c'm p: $ To: From Date: Planning Commission Cha; man Kelly Orono Planning Commiss'* .-.» Members City Administrator Mark iernhardson Jeamne A. Mabusth, Buil ing & Zoning Administrator January 12, 1989 Subject: #1334 Sidney Rebers, 7 , North Brown Road - PRD/Subdivision - Refe» ed Back to Planning Commission for Further Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Topographic an<» Building Pads - Lots 1 t'lrough 4 Exhibit B ~ Amended Plan In order to satisfy the i tent ol the Comprehensive Plan with the higher density development adjacent to the existing rural development along the northern property line of ne Rebers' property. Council has approved the 25 unit PRD with a 100* widt- restricted development area. In addition. It has required the plantin^v* of evergreen bufferea areas in three strategically placed locations 11"at would lessen the visual impact upon the adjacent properties. An agric:*-itural/farm fence will .ilso be installed along the north boundary of th t property to prevent trespass of children and animals upon the Platteter f.ooerty. Council also called for the amend ment of the original PRD tha^n i t»uld reduce the number of units to four building pads along the north , operty line in another attempt to lessen / development to the south. The reduction impact of higher density development, but pads create potential for more intense the impact of the higher dens.. from 6 to 4 lots would minimiiv would the increase in the sizit structural development? With many other pressing i sues for Council to resolve at preliminary approval. Council asked that th Planning Commission reconsider the amended proposal, specifically to deter* Ine the need for further building controls on the four northern bulldin* pads (1 through 4). The neighbors in attendance appeared concerned' that with an increase in the building envelopes, that massive st^uctu rs would be constructed creating a visual impact for surrounding rural r fsidential owners. Is the 80% hardcover limitation adequate for build! g pads ranging from 17,1:00 s.f. to 23,000 s.f.? If not, should the hardc ver allowance be reduced or would other controls be more effective in re ucing the visual impact of development at the higher elevations along the "orth border? p/:-,te -5