Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File 11874 <br />October 14. 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />Should storage modules be placed over landscape areas designated on the site <br />plan, thereby reducing hardcover’ Or should thev be placed in designated <br />parking spaces, thereby reducing the already limited parking (a variance has <br />already been granted to allow 42 spaces instead of the requited 48)? <br />5. If parking spaces are reduced, how will applicant deal with overflow parking' <br />Is the need for storage seasonal, and would it be feasible to have the storage <br />modules removed from the site during some seasons? <br />7.How will the storage rntnlules be screened from public vievv, i.e. from the lake <br />and from the road? Will thes be in character with the club house building? <br />8.In general terms, how does the Planning Commission feel about an increase of <br />structural hardcover in the 0-75 ’ zone on this limited site? <br />9.The DNR has been notified of this application (required by the Shoreland <br />Regulations) and has recommended denial of any location in the 0-75 ’ zone, but <br />would not object to them over existing hardcover in the 75-250 ’ zone. <br />Sta^ Recommendation <br />Planning Commission is requested to determine if a suitable hardship exists and <br />recommend whether storage modules should be allowed to be placed on the property; if so, <br />where should they be located; how they should be screened; if parking spaces arc eliminated, <br />how parking will be dealt with; whether hardcover tradeoffs are needed or advisable; and <br />address other pertinent issues. <br />mit rf ^ii I iiiiim-tlMii ■Mil <br />j