Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File /!^1885 <br />November 12, 1993 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />3. <br />4. <br />Review Exhibit N. Two alternate development plans lor an expanded Highway 12 <br />corridor along County Road 6 will impact this property. Does this influence your <br />decision? <br />The City planned for a total of 300-450 units of future development where existing and <br />proposed uses of City, the school and now Mn/DOT will limit the development of those <br />units. Does this influence your decision? <br />5. Should the City ’s decision be influenced by the need to make payment for certain public <br />facilities installed and planned for the servicing of these units? <br />Planning Commission members should be prepared to make a recommendation to the <br />Council with the necessary supportive findings. <br />Review of PUD Development Plan <br />Proposed average lot size = 44,010 s.f. <br />Exclusive of road and open space outlot = 28 539 s.f. <br />Smallest lot size is 17,200 s.f. <br />Larcest lot size is 88,970 s.f. <br />W <br />Proposed building setbacks <br />30* front yard setback <br />50 ’ rear yard setback, 100 ’ along County Road 6 and Willow Drive <br />10 ’ side yard setback, 30 ’ adjacent to Willow Drive <br />26’ to wetland <br />Lot Configuration Issues <br />The R-1A or one acre zone would require 35 ’ street, 30 ’ rear and 10 ’ side setbacks. The <br />proposed setbacks work for this PUD. They appear to function for this lot layout. Staff sees <br />no problem. Note the 30 ’ side setback of the two acre zoning district was called out for the lots <br />along Willow, Lots 1 and 3. As already stated, the lots along County Road 6 have 100 ’ <br />setbacks providing not only a buffer to the northern residential lots but also to the busy county <br />road. Some of the residential units do not meet the required 26’ setback from the adjacent <br />wetland. Filling for the building pads is also located within the 26’ setback. Stafl recommends <br />that the 26’ setback be maintained for all land alterations and structural setbacks. <br />Grading, Drainage, Welland Areas and Flood Plain <br />Note all building pads are lined along the road with filling proposed to raise building sites <br />to allow for walkouts to rear. Lots 10, 11, 12, and 13 al.so propose a walkout design as <br />information shows building pads raised 8’ to bring fill dangerously cloce to the wetland area, <br />b is doubtiul whether four lots can be developed in the area.