Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File 'H891 <br />November 5. 1993 <br />Pace 2 of 3 <br />3. Sect.on 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) - F.evievv of lot coverage <br />Total lot area = 28,100 s.f. <br />Allowed = 4,21,"' s.f. or 15% <br />Preposed = 2,436.5 s.f. or 8.6% <br />No variance required. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A <br />B <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />I' <br />G <br />H <br />I <br />Application <br />Property Owners Idst <br />Plat Map <br />Survey <br />Hardcover Fact Sheets <br />Staff Site Tian <br />Survey for Development Plan for North Lot (110 Leaf Street) <br />Elevations <br />Floor Plan <br />Description of Request <br />The applicant proposes a 24’ x 30’ addition to the south side of the existing residence <br />consisting of two-stall garage, bathroom, laundry room and new side entry to the first floor. <br />The e.evations also show a lower level side loading garage (review Exhibit H). As applicants ’ <br />survev/site plan shows, the addition will be placed over e.visting driveway/parking area. A small <br />triangular portion of the addition will encroach the 75 protected setback area. Review Exhibit <br />G. In an earlier variance review, the Ordinary High Water Mark of the tributary was <br />determined at the 979 elevation. Ponding is controlled by the dam to the south of the property. <br />The improvement will result in 7.5 s.f. of additional hardcover within the 0-75’ .setback area. <br />The residence was constructed in April of 1959 under a zoning ordinance that would have <br />required 25,000 s.f. in area and 120’ of lot width. The lot met the necessary standards in 1959. <br />Note the property is platted to the centerline of Leaf Street. It is the normal practice of <br />the City to define the front street setback line from the defined right-of-way at 33’. The <br />neighbor to the north in an earlier agreement at the time of the sewering of the area, agreed to <br />deeding tlie City 25’ for the right-of-way with a 10’ drainage and utility easement. Refer to <br />E.\Iiibit G. If applicant wishes^to deed the City 25’ of right-of-way. 'fhe City would be able <br />to :onsider the setback from the 25’ dedicated right-of-way. If not, the City to be consistent <br />must consider the right-of-way shown at 33’. Hardcover facts would have to be adjusted by <br />reducing area of 75-150’ setback area.