Laserfiche WebLink
r" <br />MEVLTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD OCTOBER 18. 1993 <br />(#4) #1878 aiARLES AND SHIRLEY PYLE <br />Pyle explained that the architect redesigned this with the architecture of the riH>f. «Ie thought <br />some reduction would be pt>ssihle. The garage could ni>t be moved right ik le ht'use <br />because there are bedonun windows on that side of the house. He contlrmed that the exterior <br />of the garage wimld be redone at the time of the rcmixJehng project. <br />Gaffron noted the breczeway could be shortened up with less sidewalk and more green space to <br />help reduce hardcover. <br />Pyle stated he would be agreeable tt> some reduction in the brec/eway as well as some asphalt <br />ir the driveway . <br />It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Berg, to approve Application #1878 subject to reductions <br />of approximately 10” of driveway parking apron and a portion of llie breczeway for a total <br />hardcover reduction of approximately 250 s.f. The new des:gn will be brought to Council. Other <br />conditions recommended by staff are still appropriate other dian the change in percentage. Ayes <br />6, nays 0. <br />(#5) ALLEN AND KATHLEEN BAKKE <br />1127 LOMA LINDA AVENUE - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 8:42 P.M. - 9:05 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />Allen and Kathleen Bakke were present. <br />Gaffron explained that this applicaliiin is a result of the neighbor getting a survey’ and finding <br />the Bakke ’s fence to be over the lot line and the deck too close to the lot line. Upon <br />investigation, it was found the decks were done in 1985 without a building permit. <br />Bakke confirmed that the existing deck was refurbished in 1985 with an additional deck to the <br />front. He stated he had conversation with Tom Jacobs, the Building Olticial at that time, who <br />told him no pennit was necessary to refurbish the deck. He feels there were inaccurate surveys <br />which is why the fence was not w ithin the Bakke lot line. The east side fence has been moved <br />within the Bakke property line. <br />Gaffron addressed the issue of the shed. Bakke confirmed that the shed wt>uld be moved when <br />they left the property. <br />There was discussion about the accuracy of the survey submitted w ith the application. It was <br />determined that the survey submitted, dated October 6. 1993. is accurate.