Laserfiche WebLink
IL^ <br />7jmm File §\m <br />Oouiicf 15. 1993 <br />IPafc 2 <br />In adiStioa k» iIk teiemi sir n te fear a <br />lobedrrcfaprd ^i; CamniHiiS <br />iitinof (sfi fen. fes 4id m ammm ir mj t^dk <br />id fidURi <« Nlisi <br />KMot |srfe yntls <br />Cmi^ ds line kf«r (si! lul f) mxk c«sms»M » ds f*.i ^ «ctko2s Jn^tnated <br />■MhiMi* orw Satr WeilaisJ CofamaMMi ^ fwArlisri grcaih ifee wcilaad utai ifeiwn <br />c» OroiD't 1975 maps S^mflcaM arm n4 Tyf€ I aaJ 2 wmUxsi m» ihtsmn <m Cfewm map* <br />has heca idcflUfjed on Kuh proprrtss. aadi poiics (pmtwa cm^ be de^ sidi a» •« afwihci <br />thc» am «in be OMMlmd hv the C«^ as <lr> NwktaMe if tfemin »idi juftelictiiMi <br />allow diew nc s afl S»M fim staff, ds desetoper. mi reptncmivn fm ds vanous <br />ag cBcies lowjived are ncctHif oc Monday. Ocicbcf l^ihi h» re^ww the issun <br />StidTE *■.1- .tlLijJ^ais <br />As a idicich ^bui fniew. cha b Hai <br />caffy apM eo varkwa i&^ies. <br />CoaunmiQn*i <opp«t&^'» give dir developer <br />Stall rc <br />OR the follo«ti« <br />W.luSfMi:^l is dm PlMSii^ C'oadhisik« miew with the develoftr your (hnugfus <br />1. CoB^spl of IB iiaerjwtthe ceosn^pait m AiKical Biaial Site <br />Coaetpt ri 'raib emderinf through the sto <br />3. Loi^ .ul-de iiacs versus ’ihTJugh’ roatb - provtskMB for htturo aimi»ia!eclk>fB <br />PuMiC roads versus private roads. <br />Access to cxistLrg mads <br />6. <br />7. <br />Li>t width variaricn tor culde vac kxs and kHs oa sharp curves <br />Standard plat with trail/parkyprivaic road ^Hitk)ts and fully conforming lot sizes <br />versus PRD ciwiccj^ with tluvtering. If the delineated Type 1 and 2 wetlands <br />ultimately esn't be credited as dry buildablc, appikant may wish to consider i <br />PRD with some clusienng. and tnc question is raised as to whether ^ City <br />would accept a planned <kvck>pnicm with ssmic substandard sized lots. Staff can <br />discuss this further at the meeting. (Drainficld site preservation is staffs main <br />concern). Please review the standards of Section 10.32 (Exhibit F) which you <br />will see gives developers significant layout flexibility but virtually no flexibility <br />for overall density increases.