My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 3:56:21 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 3:47:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File mSA <br />October 15, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />clearing" is defined in Section 10.56, Subdivision 3.13 as "the complete removal of trees or <br />« • • U # * * **shrubs in a contiguous ^ strip, row, or "'x' <br />The property owner upon notification of the violatit)n indicated a know ledge of the code <br />prohibitions on tree cutting. This property owner has been before the Council in the past for <br />grading violations in the 0-75’ zone in conjunction w iih their previous residence on Maxwell Bay <br />(see Exhibit L). <br />The property owner w as issued a violation citation, told to do no further work to remove <br />the stumps which remain today as evidence of the violation, and advised to make this after-the- <br />fact application. Staffs intent for the application process in this case is not to ultimately have <br />the after-the-fact variance approved, but to deny the variance and have Planning Commission <br />and Council review and approve a restoration plan. This is in line with the DNR comments <br />dated October 14, 1993 (Exhibit J). <br />Extent of Clearing <br />Please review Exhibit E. In the non.herly 1/3 of the 0-75’ zone, three trees 6" or greater <br />in diameter were removed. Two 24" maples and one 30" other hardwood remain. What does <br />not show on the sketch is that approximately two dozen 2" to 6" trees were removed, as well <br />as two to three dozen 0 to 2" trees. The stumps of all trees are clearly evident if you visit the <br />site. <br />In the southern third of the 0-75’ zone, tlie surveyor has identified the location of seven <br />stumps with diameter 6 s greater (staff noted nine such trees, see photos). Again, <br />approximately two dozen ' ' lO 6" trees were also taken and a virtually uncountable number of <br />0 to 2" trees and shrubs uial w : o likely 3’ to 15’ in height. Note that no grading was done in <br />the 0-75’ zone. <br />Restoration Plan <br />Please see Exhibit I. Applicant’s landscape designer proposes to replant Linden and Aih <br />species to replace the 6’’+ diameter trees removed. He has indicated to staff that these trees <br />would be in the 4" to 5 ’ caliper range, the largest size lie would expect to survive transplanting <br />in this area. On the north 0-75’ area, he proposes three trees to replace the three 6" + trees that <br />were removed. In the south 0-75’ he proposes six trees, plus three along the lot line adjacent <br />to the neighbor ’s tennis court and just outside the 0-75’ zone. <br />Although he has not specifically propo.sed any additional trees or shrubs to compensate <br />for the many smaller trees that were cut, he has indicated verbally that gray twig dogwv od <br />would be a suitable understory' planting. <br />(
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.