10-18-1993 Planning PacketC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ii «1 OROHO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 1990 —Tt r • 1SSS-PICHARO ANDERSON CONTINUED T::. ^r:::nL:!':ns^Tt%T.%l Mr. And.r,on to ono, tKe d.ct into conforniance. Johnson withdrew his motion. It was moved application 11565. Motion carried. by Johnson, seconded by Kelley, to table Motion, Ayes-:, Cohen, Rowlette, Nays. #1566 DR. » MRS. THOMAS REGNIER 1225 ELMWOOD AVENUE VARIANCE ^ pflTlT TP HEARING ^j55 P.M. TO 10t02 P«M. rr. and Hr,. Ragnier an= Mr. Dale Mjlfincer, Architect, were present Caffron explained the prcccal tein? presented (see Michael Gaffron's rcmo dated July 10, l'*?0). .Mr. Mulfincer stated that the plan proposed this evcninc will rra'<e the most of the existing lavc':t of the house. Rowlette asked whether a floor plan had teen submitted with the application. Mrs. Reamer provided a cooy of tne floor plan. Kelley asked Caffron whether staff had been able to verify that the survevor had included ail existing hardcover in the calculations provided. Kelley noted that the indicates that there is no hardcover on the north side of the orooertv, Rowlette noted that there is a fenced area on the north side of the garage that does not show on the plans. Gaffron reolied that he has reviewed the surveyor's calculations but did not take the time at the site to verify each ite.m Shown. Gaffrcn stated that due to the bulk of appl ications, staff no longer can spend a jreat amount of time re-checking surveyor's hardcover calculations. Especially when those calculations use standard C.ty forms and appear complete. He said that the City is going to have to relv more on the applicants and their surveyors to provide accurate information. consider She alsoRowlette asked the applicants if they wculd renovina the fencing on the north side of the garage, noted that there is a section of fence missing. Or. and Mrs. Reamer indicated that they do not use the fenced area and would con.siier rcmv>vinu it. - H -