My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 3:56:21 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 3:47:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 <br />ZONING FILE #1750 - CONT. <br />Hanson said from the beginning they knew they would have to make <br />concessions, and they tried to reduce the hardcover prior to <br />submitting the original proposal. After the first Planning <br />Commission meeting they were asked to reduce hardcover percentages <br />more, which they have done. <br />Jabbour noted that at one point a project becomes over ambitious <br />for the lot. He stated the City’s ordinances reflect their concern <br />about water run-off Into the Lake. <br />Mr Pyle said the first group of Planning Commission members to <br />review the proposal did visit the site and felt the project was <br />beneficial, but the second group did not Inspect the property. <br />Goetten stated she appreciates the cuts the applicants have <br />proposed, but felt the project too ambitious for the lot. She <br />agreed with the Planning Commission’s recommendation of 18X total <br />lot coverage. <br />Mrs. Pyle referred to two small planting areas In the 0-75’ setback <br />area. She stated the boxes around the plantings and plastic <br />underneath could be removed. <br />Mabusth stated this would reduce 0-75’ hardcover by 177 s.f. <br />It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve <br />AppIIcatlon #1750 for Charles and Shirley Pyle, 3548 Ivy Place, for <br />variances to construct an addition to the existing residence, “jsed <br />on Condition #1 of the resolution be removed and a condition tnat <br />the triangular planting areas and plastic underneath be removed, <br />and limiting lot area coverage to 21.5X. Ayes 2, nays 3. Callahan, <br />Jabbour and Goetten voted nay. Motion falled. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to table Application <br />#1750 for Charles and Shirley Pyle for two weeks to allow the <br />applicants time to reconsider their proposal. Ayes 3, nays . y <br />Peterson and Butler voted nay. Motion carried. <br />Goetten explained that If the application were <br />appiIcants would not be allowed to return with another proposal tor <br />six months.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.