My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
10-18-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 3:56:21 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 3:47:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1878 <br />October 14, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />Discussion <br />Please review Resolution #3183 and the site plan approved with that resolution. In <br />comparing the current proposal to that approved in September 1992 the following changes are <br />noted: <br />1. <br />0 <br />The e.xisting detached garage will remain, and no new garage is proposed. <br />Driveway revisions with the current proposal are minimal. <br />3.While the 0-75 ’ hardcover reductions approved previously are proposed to be <br />carried out, hardcover reductions associated with the garage project in tht 75-250 ’ <br />zone are not proposed. This results in merely an 11 % 75-250 ’ reducti'm rather <br />than the 21% reduction under the old plan. <br />Lot coverage by structures under the current plan will increase from 14.8% :o 20.4% <br />where 15% is the standard allowance. The previous approval was for 20.6%, the difference <br />being in the size of the existing and previously proposed garage. <br />The Planning Commission is asked to recommend whether the current p oposal is <br />acceptable. Please review the findings and conditions in Resolution #3183. The removal of <br />trees is no longer an issue. The extent of site regrading will be relatively minimal with this <br />proposal. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />If Planning Commission finds that the findings of hardship and unusual property <br />conditions as stated by the applicant in the current application and in Resolution #3183 are <br />adequate to justify granting of the proposed hardcover variances, then a recommendation for <br />approval would be appropriate, conditioned on: <br />1. Limit structural improvements to 20.4% lot coverage on the property. <br />Upon application for building permit provide: <br />a suix'ey locating all existing and proposed improvements <br />detailed grading and drainage plans <br />all hardcover scheduled for removal be removed prior to footing <br />inspection for the new construction. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.