Laserfiche WebLink
/ <br />To:Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Mavor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />August 13, 1993 <br />#1845 Ernest Lemmerman, 1297 vV r'dhurst Trail - Sketch Plan <br />No published notice or written notific '.-on of neighbors required <br />Mr. Lemmerman has filed a sketch plan application seeking direction from Planning <br />Commission members concerning feasibility of a proposed lot line rearrangement and eventual <br />lot area variance for the development of a vacant lot. The following ordinances are pertinent <br />for this review: <br />Section 11.10, Subd. 6, 7. and 8 - Sketch plan. Members are once again advised that <br />the purpose of a sketch plan is to allow for preliminary development plans to be <br />presented to the Planning Commission whereby the applicant receives conceptual <br />direction from the City for preparing a formal application and, hopefully, will result in <br />a saving of time and money. Applicants can gauge the feasibility of an application by <br />the comments and directions received from the Planning Commission. Normally sketch <br />plans are only reviewed by the Planning Commission and only under special conditions <br />will the sketch plan reviews be presented to the Council. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - <br />B - <br />C - <br />D - <br />E - <br />F - <br />G - <br />Application <br />Location Map <br />Survey of 1297 Wildhurst Trail, Mr. Lemmerman ’s Homestead <br />1985 Proposed Subdivision - Sketch Plan Review <br />January 21, 1985 Planning Commission Minutes Review Sketch Plan <br />Sewer As-Builts <br />Current Proposal <br />Review of Application <br />In 1985, applicant proposed a more complex lot line rearrangement involving the two <br />adjacent landowners. Review Exhibits D and E. As the subdivision would involve an increase <br />in area for substandard adiacent properties. Planning Commission members looked favorably on <br />the proposal. The applicants never proceeded with the lot line rearrangement. The vacant lot <br />as shown on Exhibit B remains undeveloped.