My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-16-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
08-16-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 12:12:20 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 12:06:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD AUGUST 16, 1993 <br />7X)NING FILE /i^l845 - CONT. <br />Mabuslh explained applicant seeks direction concerning approval of a proposed lot line <br />rearrangement and variance tor the developmer;i of a vacant lot. The access U) Mr. <br />Lemmerman's property is on Wildhurst Trail. He has purchased tax forfeited property and has <br />about 33.000 s.f. in area. The proposed lot line rearrangement will reduce the vacant lot to <br />19.600 s.f. Mr. Lemmerman's homestead lot would be increased to 26,150 s.f. <br />U*mmerman explained that the undeveloped lot has an unusual shape and a steep hill. He has <br />proposed to exchange part of the property with a neighbor and sell part to another but nobtnly <br />is interested. He has been there for 36 years and has cleaned up tliat area. It has a nice view <br />of Forest Lake. <br />Chair Schroeder asked if it is a buildable lot. <br />Mabusth answered the lot needs variance apprtnal as it is in a I acre zone. It is sewer <br />approved. <br />Nolan asked whether it would be a benefit to rcahgn the lot for better balance. Your wall is <br />only a couple of feet behind your garage. The line could actually be moved further down to <br />balance. <br />Lcmmerman said that would not be a problem and noted the hill being useless. He explained <br />several years ago the residence had burned down an the vacant land. <br />Chair Schroeder stated that the issue here would be a let area variance. <br />Mabusth explained a lot area variance would be needed if he was to build on this parcel. A lot <br />width variance would not be necessary because he meets 80% of tliat but he doesn ’t meet 80% <br />for the required lot areas. <br />Lcmmerman stated that he would have no problem dropping the lot line down. <br />Mabusth asked if members look favorably at the current proposal for a lot line rearrangement. <br />It was reviewed favorably in 1985 and the Planning Commission gave a recommendation of <br />positive direction - formal action on a sketch plan is not required and members need only give <br />direction to the applicant. It would also help to determine lot lines by examining a topographic <br />map but we do not have any topo information. <br />17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.