Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1852 <br />August 13, 1993 <br />Page 3 <br />Please review Exhibits M and N, the resolutions that granted approval of the first and <br />most current CUP. As Gustafson’s report notes, many of the conditions set forth in the previous <br />approvals will hold true for the final 70,000 cubic yard permit. Please review Exhibit A-1. The <br />applicant seeks approval of a two-year deadline for filling. Applicant advises the materials to <br />complete the current CUP will be from a project called Gleason Creek Improvements. This is <br />a joint project of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City of Wayzata involving <br />the excavation of two large ponds and sedimentation basins to reduce flooding in the City of <br />Wayzata. Based on applicant's approximations, it would appear that 40,000 cubic yards of <br />current 70,000 cubic yard permit be completed in the fall or winter of this year and that in the <br />second or final year, 30,000 cubic yards of fill would be placed. <br />Staff (Public Works Director, Police Department, Building Staff and Consultants) have <br />met with GL Contracting representatives and the applicant to discuss the hauling route and time <br />frame. Filling has already taken place under the current CUP and has proceeded without any <br />incident except for one inspection completed by the Building staff where it was found that trees, <br />fuel tanks and other construction debris were being filled over. A Stop Work Order was posted <br />by the Orono staff. The contractor has advised that the illegal debris has been removed. <br />Applicant should be cautioned that only clean fill shall be allowed and that site cannot function <br />as a sanitary landfill and should not be receiving materials as observed by the Building staff. <br />Applicant should be asked to respond to this matter. <br />Please note the older plans submitted for the 1987 review (Exhibits H. I and J) were <br />developed for an earlier application before the City and were accepted for the ’87 review. The <br />cross sections show fill at a 2(X),(3(X) cubic yards widi a 10’ vertical height. Review Exhibit L. <br />This sketch was drafted by Glenn Cook depicting a typical section for a fill project at 100,000 <br />cubic yards limited to a 5’ vertical rise. <br />Applicant should be asked to comment on his future plans for this site. The property is <br />zoned RR-IB and could never be used for residential development nor do the various reviewing <br />agencies recommend that the area be ever used for the planting of crops. The Engineer ’s current <br />report suggests that we view the aestnetics of allowing more fill at some future time. The higher <br />elevations would not be consistent with the surrounding wetlands. Please remember this was <br />a former wetland area that was filled many years ago and was contiguous with the surrounding <br />wetland. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />As City has already found no issue or problem with approving 100,000 cubic yards for <br />this site in 1987, staff would suggest that the additional 70,()00 cubic yards be approved for <br />placement and filling on the site subject :o the appropriate conditions of the original Resolution <br />No. 2192 and the more recent conditions as set forth in Resolution No. 3192. As already noted <br />in the memo above, staff requests copies of a grading plan and erosion control detail submitted