My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-16-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
08-16-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 12:12:20 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 12:06:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
\nNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINT; <br />HELD AUGUST 16, 1993 <br />ZONING FILE #1851 - CONT. <br />Peterson asked how the discharge of the water softener through an independent separate facility <br />would be accomplished. <br />Mabusih stated it would be an outlet to the rear of property. Water softeners create a burden <br />for rural properties. Although the soft water h clean, it does have an impact on a septic system <br />especially one that is under heavy usage. <br />Nolan asked about the relocation of the two buildings as the back drops off significantly. <br />Phillips stated that one is all right and the other one can be pushed back 10’ if necessary. The <br />front one which is too close to the line is used for tool storage and will not be on Woodlands <br />property. He will give pemiission for use on his property. The one funher back is okay where <br />it is and has a primary use for storage of the lawn mower. <br />Smith asked why the property line wasn't even when there was an even exchange of property. <br />Phillips explained that he is giving up 6,000 s.f. in the southern corner near County Road 6. <br />It is needed to accommodate a future 2-acre lot in the front half of his 4 1/2 acre lot. <br />Mabusth stated the recent survey suggests the existing structure is not 30’ from the west side lot <br />line. This would be an attempt to bring it into conformity along the west lot line. <br />Smith inquired what precautions can be made to ensure that similar septic problems don’t arise <br />in the future. <br />Mabusth said meters arc used in rural areas. The site evaluator has also provided procedures <br />to protect and define septic areas w-here questionable uses exist. <br />Phillips commented he thought he had a secondary site with a good primary septic but instead <br />found it to be poorly designed and constructed and also inspected by the City poorly. The City <br />should have detected that it w'as undersized. <br />Mabusth replied it would appear that the water use was not anticipated. <br />Phillips said the architect, builder and everybody knew precisely what the home was to be used <br />for. He is not a water expert so was not aware of the problems. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.