My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
09-20-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 12:13:02 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 12:06:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
394
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
calculations dealing with lakeshore setback for the new structure, garage stall will be located <br />in the 0-75’. There will be more permanent structure hardcover within the 0-75’. Hardcover <br />in the 0-75' exists at 24.29^0 and is now proposed at 17.8%. This reduction is in landscape areas <br />that were installed prior to Spinner purchasing the property. Applicant is ofreritig to remove <br />plastic in land.scaping areas. <br />Rowlette stated that the reduction in hardcover is accepting structural for non-structural. <br />Nolan asked if the calculations as now stated include the plastic. <br />Schroeder asked if the applicant had any comments. <br />Contractor stated that applicant is also going to remove some of the .sidewalk on the west side <br />of the garage (96 s.f.). Removing concrete on the east side would cause a drainage problem, <br />cau.sing erosion problems that would cau.se the garage footing to be above frost line. He <br />reviewed the history of the situation. Doesn ’t understand why it’s a problem as the garage <br />addition would be built over the existing concrete drive. Feels that removing the hardcover <br />would erode land and cause the garage to shift. <br />Nolan disagreed stating that he viewed the property and felt there are alternative methods to <br />control erosion such as vegetation. <br />Contractor fell that it would be inconvenient for applicant not to have hardcover and disagrees <br />with Commission ’s view. <br />Nolan explained that Commission would like the resident to conform with current hardcover <br />standards. <br />Schroeder asked whether they had looked at other areas to remove hardcover. <br />Contractor replied that they had. <br />Smith asked if applicant had considered placing the addition on west side near front entry? <br />Contractor said it would not be possible as it would block the entr> way. <br />Kowlelve stalCvi her concern is the e.\ces.sive amount of concrete all around the house. <br />Nolan asked why he <xys the hardcover is for drainage. <br />Conlracior explained it’s because of the slope of the neighbors lot. <br />Rowlette suggest the drainage could be accomplished with a culvert or drainage .swale. Feels <br />home is incredibly overbuilt with excessive amount of hardcover and would like to tiee some <br />hardcover removed and that none of that amount is structural. <br />Nolan asked about the eaves.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.