My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-1993 Planning PacketC
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
09-20-1993 Planning PacketC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2023 12:13:02 PM
Creation date
11/1/2023 12:06:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
394
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There was some discussion as lo the s.f. figures in the original hardcover sur\ey and it was <br />discovered that some of the figures had been rounded off. <br />It was moved by Rowlelle, seconded by Nolan, to recommend approval of application #1863 <br />for Robert Luesse, 3249 Casco Circle, for the amended variance application subject to the <br />installation of a firewall. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. <br />(#14) #1864 IRWIN JACOBS <br />1700 SHORELINE DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING <br />Jim Jenson represented Mr. Jacobs. <br />Mabusth explained tha-l the application involves a conditional use permit for a new caretaker <br />residence to replace an older caretaker residence on the original 2.7 acre parcel. Mabusth <br />explained that there were previous applications for vanances for a guest hou.se and oversized <br />accessory structures and those applications had been approved. <br />The .structure meets the 100' lakeshore setback and that only a grade level patio is propo.sed <br />within the 75-100’ setback area which is allowed by the current code. The structure will also <br />be decreased by 349.8 s.f. <br />Peterson asked if anyone was able to view the property. <br />Rowlelte responded that she went to the gate and the caretaker came to get her and showed her <br />around the property. <br />Schroeder commented that there wasa breakdow n in communication and sugge^ ted that it be <br />addres.sed. <br />Peterson stated that he was not certain of whether he could vote on the property as he was <br />denied access to the property. <br />Mr. Jenson apologiied for the breakdown in communication and said he would address it. <br />Schroeder asked why Mr. Jacobs wanted to build the structure. <br />Mr. Jensen replied that the existing structure is very old and in great disrepair. <br />Schroeder asked which Commission members were able to view the property and a.sked <br />whether it could be voted on now. <br />Rowlette commented that .she had no problem with the propo.sal. She d.scovered in her <br />conversation with the caretakers that the structure doesn't even have a foundation under it - <br />it’s just a dirt lloor with wood over it. <br />Schroeder a.sked about the .septic.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.