09-20-1993 Planning PacketC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Smith, to recommend approval of application #1858 for John and Marla Meridith, 3685 Watertown Road for variances discussed being that the accessory structure is 4,800 s.f. instead of the allowable 3,000 s.f Smith added that if the property was ever subdivided, the owner would take responsibility for those structures. Also required is the updated survey, and the understanding that maximum allow able horses on this properly is 7 based on the size of the land and is for personal use and not a business. Vole: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#10) #1859 JEFFREY H. MUELLER 222 BEDERWOOD DRIVE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Mueller was present. Mabuslh explained that the applicant .seeks approval of a setback variance that would allow an accessory structure to be placed in the front of the front line of the principle structure. The structure will also require a side setback variance. The improvement involves a complete replacement of the detached garage within the street yard of the properly. It will be built within the current building envelope. Mabusth asked the applicant whether he could move the structure over enough to meet the side setback. Mr. Mueller agreed that he could do that. It was moved by Rowlelte, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of application #1859 for Jeffrey H. Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive for accessory structure built in front of the front line of the principle structure. Vote; Ayes 7 Nays 0. (#11) #1860ZELMA H. MCKINNEY 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING Mrs. McKinney was present and accompanied by her daughter, Gayie Siegler. Mabusth explained that property is located in Navarre Heights on Livingston street. Mrs. McKinney purchased the property in May, 1962 when triplex use w'ould have been permitted. It was always used as a rental properly. There have been zoning amendments since whereby only single family residential use would be allowed. Mrs. McKinney is applying for a conditional u.se permit per Section 31 100 of the 1975 Code. Mrs. McKinney seeks approval of two residential units; one to r>e owner-occupied and the other a rental apanmeni. The majority of neighbors that called were .satisfied to hear that the property won U be ow'iier- occupieJ duplex and only one neighbor preferred to see the properly revert to single family dwelling status. Commission members fell the properly was visually appealing and if the properly did revert to single family, the exterior of the structure would not be altered in anyway. 13 I J