Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />**4, <br />TO:PtJini^ CoBomMOQ Mcabm <br />Roa Moom. Coy AtfmrturMw <br />FROM Jeanne A. Mabmih. IfenUtof & Zotung Admimsln im <br />DATE:Jttfy 14. 1993 <br />SLUICT: 41S4: To« and Sheila Itewne. T<sO South Brtr*ti Road • ViriaiKcs <br />Public Hearing <br />The appHcaiioii involves murtipte vartinm foe additions to the existing principal structure <br />and the insuDatioi* of an acoesaory stfucture on the rtcenUy classified Ukeshore property . Fof <br />v»rs the applicants had proposed improvements maintaminf a 26 ’ netback from the Zetland <br />Incased siithin the east portion of ha pro perty. Review Exhibit F. ^jiplKants' hardcover facts <br />have been prepared basol on the setback from the Long Lake protected tnbuury ai the east <br />boiBadary of loi. Unfomtnaicly. per the shorcland ordinance. Tanagcr Lake at the 929.4 <br />elevation is now located at what was orifinally determined to be the edge of the wetiaiid. Staff <br />has to rcadjtat the hardcover facts based on the 75* s^bKk line described in Exhibit O, <br />Two-thirds of the dry boiklable envelope arc ih3w kxitcd within the 0-75* setback area where <br />no tmprovemems are allowed Smicturcs that normally met the 26 ’ setback are now <br />nonconforming located within the IQO’ setback required for stniemres from shoreline of <br />Recreatioial DcvelopiKm lake. The foUowing ordinances are peninem for this review; <br />Section 10 Subd. 16 (C-1) - Setbacks tor Recreational Devdopment lakes The <br />following ifnpfovcmcms require setback variances: <br />A.UpfKT level deck to be enclosed at pifi of principal structure. <br />Allowed • 100' <br />Existing - 56* <br />Proposed • 56 ’ <br />Vanance * 44’ or 44% <br />Screen porch addition located over on existing deck (review Exhibits O <br />and I). <br />Allowed - 100’ <br />Existing “ 48’ <br />Propos^ ■ 43’ <br />Variance * 57 ’ or 57% <br />C.New deck structure. <br />Allowed - 100’ <br />Existing » 55* <br />Propiiscd • 55 ’ <br />Variance » 45’ or 45%