07-19-1993 Planning PacketC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

My 14. mi Page 2 The ipptKaaa' coainctL'f oom m ftb k> applicatioo, Fahibit B. itie roadbed vcnld fee dctifBcd tp as to dirret ranofT to the totoh aaS «esi to as eitsttog colimkw pool for the load watershed Dram^ would th» travel ov^ the grassed area eventually toMatweO Bav 1.200 s f of aossinitsifal hardcover wouM remain wiihiBthe0-73 ’ Ktfesck Meat The rood is iccaied 50* from the 929.4 ekvatniL The road will letnain ai a nasimum 12 ’ widdl. Descriptioa df Harddilps. t’nufoal nndtnss or reorlirai IhfTkiiltia Pkas revtow EUiibib A aad B Appl>cana luie the fcQowtng : I o> • 3. 4 5 7. Surveyed’ had proceeded to change tocMKn of loop drive as ii fetaies to the 75* setback line rci^irq; to the City’s ordinance standards hut faded to advisf feoth owners and owners’ contractor During the winter months the contractor proceeded wkh develofxnent of the sue not realizing that the driveway was located 50 ’ from the lakeshtm It was never the nHcittkjo of owners to expand on existing driv’et bed at 12 of the tocMion of the mature trees within the area. If the facts were km^wn. loch a miuest wtmW have been incitftkd withi the variance applkaiion reviewed in S’' ember of 1992. Dnveway has exismd in its preseo cation for over 70 yean. The retocation of the drive would result in tte destruction of six to eighl mafufe oak and maple tree*. There will be no «kliiiona) encrotchmenl nor hiraer disnirbancc of tte 50 ’ setback area few installation of the road. Driveway will be constructed so that drainage would drain away from the lake towards a grassy ’ area to the west providing treatment before it enters the lake. 8. The driveway configuration faciliulcs safe ingress and egress for the site, Issires for Consideration I.Would the fact tb.it the driveway exists within the 0-75 ’ setback zone have any impcct on your decision-making?