Laserfiche WebLink
i, i: <br />P1MUTE8 Of THE ORONO KANNINQ COmiSSlON HXEflNQ <br />HEtO APfllt IS. tSSJ <br />ZONING FILE eiail - CONT. <br />Nr*, stated wh#n thay purc^asad tr»*ir proparty, tha varianca <br />had not yat Paan approvad. 8ha notad tnay along «ith R*«i*n oppoaad <br />tha firat varianca raquatt. prior to Ra«i*n porchatmg tha parcal. <br />8ha r«ad a iattar froai thair attomay pra*anttng raatont for <br />danial. Sha rafarrad to Saction 10.0# daalmg with varianca <br />approval ragarding tha haalth, aafaty and «r9lfara of tha public, <br />and tuggastad tha arosion probiaai in thia araa should «aka tha lot <br />unbuildabia a* it would ba adding to tha problaai and would ba <br />datriwantai to tha naighporhood. Sha addad thay did hava thair <br />houta iiatadprlor to this •ituation, but fait thiaaiay dapraciata <br />tha valua of thair hoa»a. Sha fait this raquast doas not Mast tha <br />critaria for approval, and suggaatad thia lot ba coebinadwith Lot <br />It. <br />Nr, Nisiadlah. potantlal buyar of Lot 1#, sdvisad that the houaa <br />will ba built back froai tha lakashora and will not add to th« <br />aroalon problan. Ha fa?t tha housa ha would build would not iowar <br />tha standards of tha naighborhood, and said ha would ba willing to <br />supply tha Biaikas with plans to present to potential purchasars <br />of the»r property. <br />Wfckaian reviewed that tha sewer connection stub for Lots 15 and 17 <br />la located within the boundary of Lot 18. <br />Nr*. Bialke atatad it is 3.5' within the boundary of Lot 18, and <br />addad thay ware unawara of that situation whan thay purchased their <br />property. Sha said the record* of the City indicate that Lot li was <br />unbuildeble and that is why tha sewer line was placed within its <br />boundary. <br />Mabusth disagreed, and stated the three parcels Lots 15. 17 and 18 <br />were owned in convson at tha tine of Instellatlon of that pipe, and <br />that It why it was placed on Lot 18. <br />Mrs. Bielke read fron memo from Qaffron to the City Council dated <br />iOeceinber 1985 which states, “they do not anticipate that Lot 18 <br />would become bulidabiu'. <br />Bellows indicated that statement means the Bielkes need a new stub <br />to their property. She felt hard pressed to deny tha recuest <br />because of pest approvals. She noted the property has changed hands <br />several times as e buildable lot, and this request would not set <br />e new precedent in the neighborhood. <br />8 <br />1 <br />..-jMaiib ..... d