Laserfiche WebLink
r>pr <br />MINUTES Of rHE ORONO PLAiNlINO CONHISSK^ MEETING <br />HELD APRIL 19. 1993 <br />ZONING FILE 91912 - CQNT. <br />6«llowt inqa*r«<j about tho saparatiofi batwttn th« garaga. <br />Nabuath noted aince the garaga la over 750 t.f. thara ahoutd be a <br />IS’ aatback. bui thara is only 4’. <br />it! Ions noted afftergancy vahiclat could not gain accaaa to tha <br />structural on this property. <br />Habusth concurred. Sha continuad that tha applicant noted tha boat <br />house to be structurally sound, however the building staff <br />disagraad and fait this to ba a total rehabilitation of tha <br />building. Total lot coverage is 4.71 over tha allowed. Tha removal <br />of the boat house would reduce the hardcover In tha 0-75* zona to <br />0.71 and would reduce lot coverage enough to off-set the addition <br />to the house. <br />Goodyear stated he has determined that the foundation of the <br />residence can support the addition. He added he proposes to reduce <br />the size of the boat house to about half, and to pour a foundation, <br />raroof and raaide it. <br />Bellows stated that was where sha drew the line. She stated her <br />first concern was the location of ths garage and tha unsafe <br />condition praaant. Sha Indicated her desire to are historical boat <br />houses maintained, but felt this one did not warrant that labal. <br />Sha disagraad with tha need for tha side setback variance. She felt <br />tha SKtent of tha Improvenients want bayond what the property could <br />sustain. <br />Johnson Inquired about the existing setback for tha right aide of <br />tha house. <br />Habusth explained currently there Is an 11* setback, and the <br />applicant proposes the extension of e 2* chimney and the squaring <br />off of the foundation from the chimney line. <br />Goodyear noted the neighboring property owner hat removed the <br />garage near his detached garage and will be rebuilding further <br />away, which creates a better separation. <br />Peterson felt the project to be too aggressive. <br />Schroeder agreed with the need for the separation for safety <br />reasons, but stated no objection to the addition of a second atory. <br />Goodyear asked that the application be tabled opposed to denied.