05-17-1993 Planning PacketC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1825 May 11. 1993 Page 4 Issues for Review 1.Lacking a hardship statement for hardcover excess of 3 + %, would members recommend a hardcover variance under any circumstances? At your site inspection, please note the drivewav improvement and lakeshore yard improvements on proposed Lot 1. 2.What alternative form of development would you recommend for approval? Note Alternate B may result in a slight area variance if shared access is required. It can be minimized if access to Lot 2 via easement is limited to existing curb cut at Shore Hills Road. Alternate A involves a reduction of some 3,000 s.f. in area for a 20 ’ x 150 ’ drive that would encroach Lot 2. Shared access would also be required. Recommendation To recommend approval of the two-lot Class III subdivision application of Thomas L. McCarthy finding that all LR-IB lot standards and shoreland development standards have been satisfied and that there is adequate sewer and water to serve a new lot based on the following conditions: 1.Applicant shall create an access and utility easement over Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2 to provide sewer service from existing serv ice-Y in lakeshore yard. Adequate care must be taken during the construction of the service line as sewer Une is located within the 0-75 ’ setback area. Applicant to provide 10 ’ wide drainage and utility easements along all perimeter property lines and 5’ along the shared lot line. 3.Upon application for a building permit, future owner of Lot 2 shall make payment for a sewer unit and water unit charge based on the current lee schedule. 4.Determination as to the recommendation for a shared access. If a shared access is required, there may be a need to grant an area variance for Lot 1. If driveway approach is restricted to the first 20 ’ within corridor, area of driveway easement could be reduced to no more than 200 s.f. It may not have an impact on lot area. 5.Members recommendation concerning excess of hardcover within the 75-250 setback area within proposed Lot 1. Are there hardcover improvements esjential to the use of the property, i.e.* backout area for driveway apron, deck adjacent to patio doors from indoor pool addition, access stairs from upper elevation doors in lakeshore yard, etc.? 1 1I